Is that the same reason Vitali retired rather than facing Rahman? Waiting until somebody else beat Rahman before coming back?
By the 3rd fight,Lewis would be pretty much 40. If the fought 3 times during his prime. I reckon its Lewis 3-0. Vitali might land a big one in one of the fights though, so maybe 2-1
They will be forever butthurt about it. They all have an unhealthy obsession with one or both of the Klitschko's and will forever obsess over trying to defend how the love of their life "won" this fight :rofl
If judge scoring don't mean anything then your scoring means even less. Vitali outboxes Lewis, prime or no prime.
Champion needs a belt to fight for championship. This is one of those customary things in boxing. You wouldn't understand. I am sure Lewis considered option of ducking mandatory contender who whooped his ass in the first fight, dropping the belt and fighting blown up LHW instead. Considered and retired.
:hitit klitchkos are the champions!!! F all u haters!!! when was the last time either has come close to losing u morons....bringing up a fight a decade ago u butthurt lewis fans living in the past...i can tell this boxing forum is full of idiot brittards from this and all the hatton loving posts...usa n Ukraine #1!!!
So Lewis could in fact still fight if he didn't have a title, right? If you say yes than there is no way he was forced to retire by anything or anyone. He retired on his own volition, end of story. Anything else you may think is biased opinion which I've proved over and over in these threads. Aren't you getting tired of me shaming you? :rofl
I'm done with you. You are a sub human life form attempting to troll. If I ever met you in real life, I would not even **** on you in fear that you might dirty my urine.