Amir Khan. Disrespectful & delusional

Who has achieved a lot more in his career than Kell Brook. Who's the ****ing laughing stock - the guy making millions per fight, or Kell Brook getting clobbered around the ring by a guy who was even more limited than Breidis Prescott?

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW7OXtVo66c[/ame]

Kell Brook calling out Pacquiao in 2010, before he fought ... yes that's right Krzysztof Bienias.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ar0rt3RaaRw[/ame]

Carl Froch criticising Nathan Cleverly.


What right does Carl Froch have to criticise Nathan Cleverly? He's never fought at 175lbs. He also lost 2 times. Yes, he has lost two fights. His opinion is surely invalid ...

 

I can read properly and what I gathered from your trash is that you're just a delusional poster who is in the world of Kell Brook's balls.

Stop posting, seriously. Also, to question he's a star? Wow, that says it all. & aren't you the inept fool that posted the argument that Kell deserves 50/50 vs Khan? Yeah, well that told me everything about you before hand.

I actually don't understand posters like you. Where does that delusion come from? If you honestly think a post like yours is even half debatable, then you need to join the Kell Brook forum, and if that doesn't exist, I half expect one to be made by you next week.

 

hes a unified champion whos beaten kotelnik, malignaggi, maidana and judah, the peterson loss hardly counts as peterson could have walked Wlad down he was juiced full of testosterone but ye fair enough he lost to Garcia but hes dining at the top table, i rate brook but theres a big gap in levels at the moment, not saying brook couldnt win or couldnt hack it at the top, but to write khan off is madness

 

God you are thick aren't you. Kotelnik is no where near being one of the worst champs of all time. You obviously failed to see that Khan was trying to goad him into a fight.

 

I got no problem with either of them. Both are british & I want our boys to be challenging among the best.

It will be a great show when it finally happens.

 

The Paulie Malignaggi point is utterly ridiculous. Khan dominated that fight, the guy doesn't have power to stay with a fast handed combination puncher. He's completely outgunned, and it showed, what on earth you saw to think it'd be different in a return I do not know.

As for disrespectful and delusional...whats new. Kid ain't bright.

 

kotelnik was a very-underated boxer who khan, at that stage of his career, did well to beat.

 

Well, you believe what you want to in your world. I can't even logically come to fathom your points.

 

Khan v Brook would be like when Khan fought graham earl.

 

khan contradicts himself he claimed that matthew hatton was a better fighter then kell brook and said he would fight the winner, and when brook has his way with matt hatton he then says ''let brook get in the ring with bradley/ devon alexander''. should brook beat devon expect khan to come out with more bull****,

 

On his day he wouldn't do anything of the sort. Paulie has a reflex based defence that doesn't hold up under examination. So when he's trying to slip shots and counter he's far more likely to simply get hit by Khan's combination punching than he is get off a perfectly timed counter. This is even more true the more the fight progresses and Paulie tires and becomes more sloppy. Khan's sloppy overeagerness is never punished in that matchup, and on the rare occasion it might be, theres no snap anyway.

The best Paulie can do is make him look bad, which he did for long periods of the first fight, but he can't win.