tony zale vs roberto duran....

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by shommel, Aug 20, 2009.


  1. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,957
    853
    Nov 23, 2007
    Zale wins, Roberto hangs tough for 9-10 rds than Tony takes over might win by TKO late
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,578
    Jul 28, 2004
    Zale would have torn Duran's body up in winning a gruelling 15 round decision. Duran may have been a better p4p fighter than Zale but the Man od Steel was a much better middleweight....especially before he went into the service in WW2.
     
  3. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    Zale, too big and proven against other fighters bigger than Duran too.
     
  4. Theron

    Theron Boxing Addict banned

    6,597
    39
    Sep 2, 2012
    Thinking of it like that i would have to change my opinion and agree with you....
     
  5. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    You know as much about Boxing as you do about being Human. Durans prime was as a Lwt. although he did fight at Middle with some degree of success. Zale of course was a natural Middle and would destroy a bloated, past prime Duran.
     
  6. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
    I'm guessing those who are picking Duran are the same ones who say he lost to Leonard, Benitez, Hagler and Hearns because the fights were not at his "natural weight".
     
  7. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,670
    12,321
    Mar 19, 2012
    Do you believe otherwise?