I don't rate Garcia that highly. He's a pretty average fighter and I could see him losing to Brook, Bradley, Matthysse, Guerrero, Ortiz, Marquez, Rios and Alvarado. I'd pick all of them to beat him though a Guerrero and Alvarado fight would be tight. If Khan didn't have such a poor chin, he'd win a very wide UD.
Surely, what matters, is what is right? Am I right? If your a betting man, you don't give a **** in whatever way you are proved right, as long as you are right. Thank you.
Brook wins this one pretty handily. Are people taking the **** with this Garcia hype or is it genuine?
Well, it matters when you boast that your picks should be taken seriously. Anyone can pick the favourite and be right the majority of the time. Good analysts pick the winner in 50-50 contests most of the time.
It's hilarious. Who exactly has Brook beaten to be so highly regarded? Lovemore N'dou! Matthew Hatton! Holy ****ing ****. At least Garcia has beaten top five opponent.
Brook on points. Garcia is being over rated after defeating a no chin hype job and some one who not only was fighting way above his best weight, but who should have retired long time ago.
OK I spoke to people that said Alexander vs. Bailey was a toss up. Same as Morales vs. Garcia. Same as Malignaggi vs Cano. Are you not entertained? :tired
Bailey ALWAYS has a chance, it's f*cking minimal against anyone skilled, unless he lands the right flush, then it turns into a massive chance. Even some of the :tired on here know that. :yep
A gut instict really. I think that Kell can be tagged with left hooks when he uses his leanback defence.... and also that Garcia can get to him over the longer distance. I'd run with Garcia TKO12.