What's the worst scorecard you've seen for the Pacquiao Bradley fight?

Well it looks like you will be slapping a lot of SPORT writers then DooFuss

 

From what I heard, that'd be a first

 

116-112 Bradley or anything wider to Bradley, as well as a card like 120-108 for Pac is pretty **** scoring too.

 

Bradley won this fight clearly.
Pac sucked.
Lazy, wasnt busy.
Ran out of gas.
Bradley clearly out worked him.
And was the BOSS at the end of the fight.
I dont put too much into punch stats.
I ignor punches that miss or are plain ineffective.
I am old school.
Bradley plain outworked Pac.
He finished strong and was the BOSS at the end of the fight.
This is the worst that I have ever seen Pac perform.
There is an old say -- the" Masses are Asses".
Its amazing who the media can sell a extremely bias perspective of a fight.
Saying that Pac won is like making people believe theat Dog**** is Icecream.
Deserve a Slap ???
I think that the best thing you can do is go "**** Yourself".

 

:blood

 

Obviously from your vulgar way of writting you must eat a lot of dog **** thinking it is icecream. You say you do not take much note of punch stats lmao Pac's Punch stat for power punches was way higher than Bradleys, those punches are scoring punches more so than a jab.
Not everyone watched HBO's version and many did not have English spoken pundits. You even say it was Pac's worst performance lmao when he clearly was more defensive than he was in any of his last 4 or 5 fights.
Please if you are a HATER just say you are, and not pretend to be a boxing afficinado when you clearly are not. 98% of sport/boxing writers around the WORLD had it in Pac's favour, are you trying to tell us you know more than THEM??? ROFL

 

I had it 8-4 Pac, I can't really remember much of the fight though, so going to rewatch,

 

7-3 pacquiao

2 rounds for the ring girls

 

Yours.

 

Rodney can be a bit...abrasive, at points. A previous interaction on a thread in Classic resulted in me putting him on ignore for a while.

That said, his point about Bradley controlling the tempo of the fight in the last four rounds is pretty valid. He took 10 and 12 and you could make a case that he deserved the 11th, too.

I had it 7-5 Pac, but it's not the worst decision I've ever seen.

 

I think that statement is as best a summary as I can think of.

Some fan cards are here at the bottom of the page:
http://eyeonthering.com/boxing/manny-pacquiao-vs-timothy-bradley
A wide range of cards, but interestingly 86% of them disagree with the offical decision.