So not not think much of Wilder you have to be a Brittard? since when? Wilder has the size and what appears to be power to be a very good heavyweight, the only problem is he hasn't took on anyone who is even remotely good and after 25 professional fights should have at least faced one decent boxer. I'm sorry but you don't need to be a Brittard to think Wilder's potential is bull****, but you do have to be seriously ******ed or Scott Gilfoid to think he is anything other than a potentially good heavyweight.
It is a devious plan of ruining Wilder. After a few camps with CHEF in charge Wilder will looks like this: This content is protected
Ahhh so if you have longer reach are taller and more muscular you automatically win? First, I don't think Wilder is more muscular but if he is so what? So are all the Mr.Universe bodybuilders out there Have you ever seen a fight where the boxer with shorter reach wins? :yep How do you know Wilder is faster or stronger? All the "advantages" you pointed out for Wilder are cosmetic. You forgot to take in consideration skill, experience, technique and mental toughness which all point to Wlad's advantage. If they were to fight this year, I'd bet the house on Wlad to win by KO. Easy money :good
He does look like the all American black guy, Wilder, a HW Ray Leonard. Could be be between him and Price a few years from now.
I agree. He has massive potential, but we just don't know anything about his defense or heart. - But folks calling him horrible, or a "glass jawed fraud" are so beyond ridiculous, it staggers the mind that anyone could be so idiotic. And why post this: ? How about these: (Fights that the Brittards like to pretend don't exist, like a US Republican claiming there's no such thing as global warming) [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxmuZMSF0Po[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6epKuRJJpHI[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZOa5Zq_Bmc[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R485vQ4OgOo&feature=related[/ame] - - But it doesn't matter. The truly moronic Brittards will continue to cling to their desperate fantasies. Clearly, Haye, Wlad, Witherspoon, Paulie, and Manny Steward are all as delusional about this guy's potential as we are! At least the Brittards have Price, who is the real deal, but why must they actually cling to the joke that is Tyson Fury? It must be al that rain that makes them so crazy.
Wilder - faced very weak opposition and looks very good doing it, has a punchers chance vs anybody in the devision Price - faced decent compotition, is the most likely succesor to the klitschko throne Tyson Fury - faced the best compotition out of the three, likely will be top dog but wouldn't favor him over price... for now still favor him over wilder (due to his last of compotition) Before putting wilder vs top dog Wlad try matching him against half decent compitition (Tyson Furry, Chisora, Povetkin).
In boxing it's definitely not the body style. Larry Holmes had a pretty funny looking body shape but he had the skills, stamina and determination to be great. He was certainly better than guys like Mike Weaver and others with amazing physiques. That having been said, Wlad is not exactly dumpy.
So how is Wilder doing against Wlad?? According to CHEF (too bad he doesn't post here because of all the idiots who don't know how to carry on a normal discussion): Wlad is much better and really starting to break Wilder down . . . but Wilder could be a champion after Wlad retires.
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl Those guys are bums, and not even heavyweight bums for the most part. Wilder is a joke.
About 90% of Wilders opponents are fat, ageing former middle/supermiddle/lightheavy weights with no power and who were never any good when at their appropriate weight class. There is a reason why he is fighting this level of opposition.