The Brawl in Montreal - who would defeat Duran on that night?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Oct 23, 2012.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,300
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    for **** sake.

    Leonard is out. we know how that fight ends.

    Think of other guys who we don't know the result of were they to face off against duran in montreal.
     
  2. rusak

    rusak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,276
    30
    Sep 28, 2012
    Leonard lost a close fight in Montreal. It wasn't lopsided at all. I had Duran winning by 2 points. If Leonard fought "smarter" he could have won.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,300
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    he had 15 rounds to "fight smarter" and wasn't able to do it that night.

    I'm not entertaining a Leonard pick in this thread as it's insane.
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Well in my mind Duran would beat most guys he fought regardless of June or a few months later. He was great as I have stated. The guys he would lose to probably are Benitez,Hearns,Leonard,Whitaker and Mayweather. Delahoya is a toss up for me. Oscar would have to use his jab and fight a very careful fight but he has the style and speed and jab to maybe do it, but he could not handle a brawl with Duran. I don't think Curry could beat Duran. Donald put his feet too wide apart, and Duran would eventually get to him and stop him late. Mosley had quick hands, but he stood still too much and that would be the same as Leonard/Duran one. I think the results would be the same in June or Nov. 1980.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,300
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    :good
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    and that was Ray's whole point of fighting Duran's fight. He wanted to beat him at his own game. Very immature of Ray. Fighting Duran's style just to prove something after he insulted his wife. but he learned a lesson.
    I remember when Ray fought Tommy in the rematch, he was pointing at his chin at press conferences and trying to get Tommy to lose confidence and to get out of his fightplan. Tommy wasn't falling for it, then Tommy said out of the blue a few days before the fight" Ray you look big!! you sure you aren't talking something?" Tommy was insinuating steriods, but he was not serious. Ray was floored. Then Ray said to Tommy " I will put my whole purse on the line if you put yours on the line also and if I am negative you give up your money" Well Tommy didn't take it, but I remember right then Tommy turned the prefight around with one comment. Ray was not as great as he wanted to be in prefight tactics. Duran was a natural and could take comments better than Ray. So could Hearns. Ray was a great fighter, but he was not the tough minded guys Hearns and Hagler and Duran were. He could beat them, but they had the long career.
     
  7. Vyborg1917

    Vyborg1917 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,788
    2
    Feb 16, 2012
    Sorry but no, go watch the fight again. He wasn’t standing toe to toe, he was imposing a distance in the fight where he could hit Duran but Duran couldn’t effectively hit him; closing that range when he knew he had him hurt.

    Yes if SRL could hurt Tommy to the body, BUT if Tommy could hurt Duran to the jaw, no hypothetical needed! I know that wasn't Duran, but no one came close to doing that to any of the other blown-up, past it versions. Even the best version of Duran has to move in on a guy with rapier-like straight punches, an overwhelming reach, and dynamite power in the right hand. It’s not detracting from the greatness of Duran to admit it’s a bad H2H; he remains the foremost of the fab four p4p IMO.
     
  8. Vyborg1917

    Vyborg1917 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,788
    2
    Feb 16, 2012
    I don't necessarily think it is. You're allowing a best version of Duran, but not a better suited, more experienced version of Leonard, irrespective of if he's changed his style or not. Either allow parity in fantasy picks or do away with the idea of an isolated version of a fighter, which is quite unrealistic anyway.
     
  9. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009

    People forget how close this fight was. Leonard fought Duran's fight and lost by a point IMO. He made a few adjustments in the rematch and easily outboxed Duran.

    So, Duran at his WW best (Montreal Duran) vs. Leonard at his WW best (Benitez, Hearns, or 2nd Duran fight)? I'll take Leonard.

    Others?

    Robinson, Armstrong, Hearns, Benitez, DeLaHoya, Mosley, Pacquiao, and Mayweather would all have a better than average chance at victory vs. Duran at WW... even "Montreal Duran".
     
  10. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Any top ATG 25 welterweight smart enough not to go toe to toe with him. It's not like he domanated Leonard that fight. I'd go as far as to say with the right judges any ATG top 25 welterweight.
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    The myth of Montreal Duran the most inveicable boxer. He's the Sidd Finch of boxing
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,300
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    not entertaining it :good
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,300
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    :-(
     
  14. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    I'd love to see Robinson go toe-to-toe with him.
     
  15. MadcapMaxie

    MadcapMaxie Guest

    Agreed it'd be amazing to witness, I wouldn't favour any Welter to go toe-to-toe with Robinson and come out the victor. His blazing combos and speed, concussive power and ultra-durability makes him a damn near impossible hill to climb.