Bradley: "Judges watched Fight, Everyone else watched Pacquiao."

and you think you are a good poster? all i read from your posts are whine. stop sucking bradley's ****.

 

Pac deserved the win however the fight was closer than what the *******s think.

 

Bradley was bitching for not getting a re-payday. LOL

 

Whine? Says the no.1 Pacquiao apologist on this forum. atsch


Marquez fans had a right to complain last November. Clearly won the fight, and it wasn't the first time he was screwed over when Pacquiao was involved. Justified unrest is not whining. :deal

As for Bradley, no one's saying he won the fight. My problem is with people who completely discredit his performance. He did a lot of good work in that fight and it was nowhere close to the near shut up some people are talking about. His jab was excellent, his head movement was exceptional. Combination punching was good. Kid can fight. Deserves credit.

In Pacland, if you haven't much power, you don't deserve any credit for anything you land. atsch


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qW-9w-IYoMA&list=FLNHyJjpLXtHO71w2yxN2fTQ&index=12&feature=plpp_video[/ame]

 

If he won the fight, why the need to justify it? Why is he still chasing Pac? Champs wait for their opponents, they don't chase anyone.

 

I had it a draw live, and 6-5-1 Bradley the 2nd time. Pac spent most of the fight just following not throwing punches. Very listless performance by him.

 

are you ******ed? pac-marquez3 was a much closer fight than pac-bradley.

 

Anybody who thought Bradley won has an agenda or has no business watching the sport because they don't understand it.

Of course it was a robbery. That's why Bradley got no respect after he won.

What fighter says, "I'll have to watch the tape," after the fight is over?

Why is this still an issue? Robberies do happen, but the world is still turning. I doubt it affected Pacquaio's earning ability.

Sure, if Pacquaio would have knocked Bradley out it would have made a bigger impression, but you can't knock everybody out.

But most logical boxing fans don't count that as a loss against Pacquaio.

 

No, because Pacquiao-Marquez III was a close fight, Pacquiao-Bradley wasn't.

 

Marquez beat Pacquiao by roughly the same margin Pacquiao beat Bradley. 2 or 3 rounds. :deal

 

I think I've found one person who thought Bradley won who's opinion is worth a damm. Even Bradley didnt think he won, what kind of fighter who thought he even remotely won says "I gotta review the tape first". Even his wife didnt think he won. Even his bloody manager didnt think he won.

Compubox stats favour Pacquiao.
49 out of 51 boxing media personalities scored it for Pacquiao.
The 5 WBO judges who reviewed the fight scored it for Pacquiao.

Pretty much everyone in the world scored it for Pac. Then you get the odd 5% but thats expected, 10% of men like to take it in the ass. You cant get a unanimous 100% verdict, there will always be the odd ones out.

 

Not even close. 49 out of 51 scored it for Pac. The media scoring for Pac-JMM was 50/50.

Even Lennox Lewis compared that robbery to his own against Holyfield, that's saying something.

 

I don't give a **** how the media scored it. The ability to think for one's self is a wonderful thing.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qW-9w-IYoMA&list=FLNHyJjpLXtHO71w2yxN2fTQ&index=12&feature=plpp_video[/ame]

 

Such a bull**** argument. 90% of the ringsiders scored it for Pacquiao and they were there live, not listening to Jim Lampley! Even that round 7, Bradley did **** all apart from land 1 punch and the rest were pity pats on Pac's gloves.

Yea make 1 extremely biased vid and use that for all arguments towards Bradley. Heck, I could make a vid scoring JMM UD Floyd if I was to use the same bias that video does.