Bradley: "Judges watched Fight, Everyone else watched Pacquiao."

why does it have to be a trade-off? pac-jmm3 was widely seen as a close fight. pac-bradley was not. just reference the polls and the media score reference of boxrec.

 

terrible video right there , theres many many internation broadcasts of that fight and all think Pac won

Even poor Bradley cant seem to secure a good fight cause no one considers him the real winnner LOL

 

Pac deserve too lose, this was a fight where Bradley was not to be in the picture and when he didn't win people cried sour grapes. The same thing will happen again when he fights Marquez. Marquez will win again even at the age he is. Pac has the same ole moves very predictable he doesn't do anything new.Another Victory for Juan in the people minds.

 

Close but CLEAR win for Marquez from almost everyone that knows how to score fights, plus almost every professional boxer who made their views be known on the night of the bout and beyond. Your bird-flu infected ass can't seem to wrap that sickness filled brain around that concept.

 

The most biased Pacquiao nuthugger on this entire forum, someone who's admitted they rarely watch anyone other than Pacquiao fight, calling someone else a joke. That's rich.

I've already said several times Bradley didn't do enough to win. So how am I trying to justify the decision? My only problem is with people who gave Bradley one or two rounds only. That's embarrassingly myopic and just plain bad scoring. You can't completely discredit a fighter's work just because he has little power or fights off the back foot.

Let's be honest, the entire forum knows what you are, so I don't need to respond to you any further or show you up for the fool you are. You do that all by yourself. Carry on.

 

No offense, but if you think that fight was 'robbery of the year', you need to watch a lot more boxing.

 

Says the guy who called Roger Mayweather featherfisted and thought Winky and Ronald Wright were two different fighters. :rofl

 

Bradley gotta drop the pac talk

 

It does have to be a trade off. Because it is a fact that Pac beat JMM and that Bradley beat Pac. If one chooses to commonly state the consensus verdict rather than the official one, then they should do that for both fights. Consensus opinion is that Pac lost to JMM and beat Bradley. That is how I casually refer to the fights when discussing them. Saying he won both or lost both is just utterly stupid. That is why.

 

This.

I remember the list of active and retired boxers and their scores of the fight. Not one for Pacquiao.

 

No he didn't?!?!

Did he?????????

 

Yeah exactly this..

 

bradley just saw the bradley highlights against pac

 

Bradley knows with absolute certainty that he lost the fight by a wide margin.

He knew that at the end of the fight.

And he knew it even better when he went home and watched the fight "to see if he'd won it."