I like Adam Booth, I think he's got a lot going for him. I think David Haye's failures have been his own fault...you can only really blame the trainer for so much; after all, despite how awesome Freddie Roach is, he couldn't do much about Amir Khan not taking Danny Garcia's punches or Pacman not being able to finish Bradley off. As far as Britain's best trainers go, Booth's certainly up there with Robert McCracken and probably better than Joe Gallagher.
1) if he didn't con people. 2) if he fought live opposition at HW 3) if he let his hands go instead of his mouth then yes, he'd be more succesful
Adam Booth is a pioneer, why isn't he a real trainer because he is not old school..? Adam Booth pretty much sums it up here in the whole interview. But at the 5min mark and onwards, he also sums it all up. Also he sums up this old school vs new school bull**** at the 7min 25sec mark and onwards... [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7nuSTbVpk4[/ame]
Why go to CW he beats every heavyweight today EASY apart from Wlad (Vitali KOs him prime vs prime but he is too old now), i would honestly like to see him fight Wlad again because i dont believe he would fight like total ***** 2 times, if they ever do fight again at least he should go out on his shield if not he should be remembered as no heart fighter...
How would that make him more successful? I'm genuinely interested. The fact that he riles up your fragile temper is the sole reason he can filling an arena while fighting a bum like Harrison or stinker like Ruiz.
You love talking about men's backsides why? you trick ass ******...probably sucking dick for crack...like you're father....:good
I think Haye would struggle with Eddie Chambers personally, and I doubt he has an easy time with Pulev.