The Brawl in Montreal - who would defeat Duran on that night?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Oct 23, 2012.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,294
    21,765
    Sep 15, 2009
    :good
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,557
    Jul 28, 2004
    Jose Mantequilla Napoles, especially the '69 version of him, would have beaten Duran that night.
     
  3. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Do you feel Monzon and Napoles are unjustly overlooked by some for the 1970s because of Duran's character and cagey ferocity? :hey
     
  4. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    big shocker there!
     
  5. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I disagree with every word here especially the contractions which should have been two words in most cases.
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    I agree what you say about Duran and Leonard. Leonard was the one who showed that using speed and sticking to a gameplan against Duran is the best way to fight him. Don't fight his fight. The irony is the first fight changed Ray and he learned, which is why I say the second fight Leonard would easily beat Duran anytime
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,294
    21,765
    Sep 15, 2009
    I wouldn't even know where to begin
     
  8. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    Duran of Montreal would've still beaten a backpedaling Ray, in my opinion. Sugar implemented a far wiser strategy on their second go, but external factors had gotten to Roberto by then.
     
  9. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    I don't see that. Duran had fast hands and if a guy was in range Duran could land. He even landed a little on Tommy Hearns when Tommy started to mix it up with him in round one, and a little in round 2 when Tommy had Duran against the ropes. Duran landed a nice right hand. But Duran's feet were a wide apart, and a guy who moved could make Duran one step behind. Rays foot movement always gives Roberto trouble.
     
  10. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    I concede that, historically, foot movement did give him the most trouble. Quick feet generally reduces the action to sporadic clashes, thereby allowing an educated puncher to pick his spots with an incoming opponent. However, Duran was not only quick himself, but also measured in his approach; I doubt very much that he'd fall for such a strategy. In fact, the whole of it strikes me less as a brilliant ploy than a rather well-timed one. Had the Panamanian entered physically at a 100%, I see Leonard eventually being drawn to a similar brawl, as seen in their earlier encounter.
     
  11. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,557
    Jul 28, 2004
    Yes. Duran was a fiery, exciting personality, and more colorful, to add to his being a great fighter, but I honestly think Monzon and Napoles were even better. Both would have beaten Duran at their respective best weights.
     
  12. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Also, perhaps more importantly, Duran lingered on the world stage longer picking up some wins, quite a few losses but more significantly exposure. Although their title reigns overlapped to a large degree, Duran was much the youngest and so was able to hang on for the Vegas years of boxing.
     
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,557
    Jul 28, 2004
    This is all true LittleRed,...this is what I meant to say..:D
     
  14. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    Look, I'm not saying Duran wasn't great... I'm just saying that Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, and even Benitez were better IMO. Some of you act like he had an easy night vs. Leonard in their first fight, and that's a lie.

    Duran fought the best fight of his career and won a close fight vs. a very good Leonard. I feel that Leonard was better in other fights and that Leonard would have beaten the so called unbeatable "Montreal Duran".

    Just my opinion, don't get all shook up over it because you think I disrespected your hero.

    I remember Duran struggling vs. Buchanan (resorting to very rough tactics) before stopping him in the 13th.

    I remember him getting dropped twice (in 2 seperate fights) and struggling vs. DeJesus in their 3 fights... losing to him once.

    He beat Leonard by close decision in 1980 then lost to him 5 months later, LTKOby8. In 1982 he lost to Benitez. In 1983 he lost to Hagler (gave him a pretty tough night). In 1984 he wasknockedthe****out by Hearns in the 2nd round.

    Wins over Lampkin and Palomino are good but not legendary.

    The win over Barkley was super close and could have went either way. A great fight vs. one of the most hot and cold fighters ever!

    Hey, I loved watching Duran fight but some of you guys are just too much. It's starting to get comical. Montreal Duran, Tokyo Douglas, 1992 Bowe...
     
  15. Pacman2011

    Pacman2011 New Member Full Member

    75
    2
    Sep 24, 2011
    no one will ever agree with you dude. this is the truth!! you said!!! "He beat Leonard by close decision in 1980 then lost to him 5 months later, LTKOby8. In 1982 he lost to Benitez. In 1983 he lost to Hagler (gave him a pretty tough night). In 1984 he wasknockedthe****out by Hearns in the 2nd round. " But the guy had an excuse allll those times!!!! take care my man.