Vitali - Is it time to stop ducking David Haye?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingWizardBoy, Oct 29, 2012.


  1. The Mangler

    The Mangler Active Member Full Member

    788
    0
    Aug 16, 2012
    Haye ducked both K bros for a couple yrs, all while talkin endless **** about em. Then he stubbed his toe and put up a non effort against Wlad.

    VK don't owe that punk jack ****. I'd like to see the fight, but it's hardly a duck if VK don't give him a shot.
     
  2. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    This content is protected
     
  3. dan4579

    dan4579 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,269
    420
    Apr 11, 2011
    I think that since the fight with Wladimir was so one sided, and Haye has done nothing to earn any kind of title shot, there should be a compromise. David Haye's brother, James, should have to give John Ruiz a fight that is televised on PPV in England as a main event, earning Ruiz as big of a check as possible. Then, David gets a shot at Vitali.
     
  4. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    Haye needs nothing.

    Vitali was the one who should have been quiet after Wlad won. But what did he do? I want to KO Haye, I want the fight and so on.

    He makes Haye "big" again so now he should stand to his words and fight David Haye.

    Haye KO´ed Chisora which Vitali could not do.

    If Vitali wants to continue fighting he should fight David Haye, nobody else.
     
  5. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    I agree with this. Vits whole claim was it was not about the money but personal. Seems to me he's letting money get in the way since making these claims. Now he's gone and said he would fight the winner of Haye-Chisora. If he doesn't is this any better than Lewis not giving him a rematch? I don't think so.

    Funny thing is I think Vittles beats him even now. I used to think Haye wasn't deserving, but in reality this is just two contenders fighting one another who have a recent common opponent. So why not make the fight? It makes sense financhialy for the fighters. It makes sense to have two contenders fight and it makes sense that it will draw the attention of not only boxing fans, but the general public as well. I think to many people are confusing this with a heavyweight champioship. It isn't. There is only one real champion in the division, so let the top 10 contenders fight one another for the right to fight Wlad.
     
  6. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    Because Wlad couldn't deliver on his promise to KO Haye. So once again Vitali is the one to come clean up after little brother, just like he took on Chisora after Wlad jerked him out of a fight twice.

    Jisi you're just terrified that Vitali will beat Haye more impressively, it would bring your world crashing down :lol: That's why you want him to forget about Haye and retire.
     
  7. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    False I do not want him to forget Haye.

    I want Vitali to fight Haye!!! And not retire to avoid Haye like he did in 2005 when he avoided his mandatory Rahman.
     
  8. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Like your hero Waldo avoided Chisora? :lol:

    Vitali underwent two complicated surgeries (knee and spine) while he was 'avoiding' Rahman. Waldo was out playing golf in Florida while he avoided Chisora :deal
     
  9. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    Chisora was no mandatory fight. A voluntary defence.

    But the WBC forced Vitali to fight Rahman, the fight was postponed several time and than Vitali retired forever!!!! I would never thought that Vitali would do so. And than coming back in 2008.
     
  10. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Chisora had 14 fights and should never have been a consideration fir either brother. Wlad because he wasn't a mandatory, and Vitaly because his resume is chock full of weak comp already.
     
  11. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    Signed contract is a signed contract, doesn't matter if it's voluntary or mando. Funny how the double standards appear when Wlad is the guilty party:lol:
     
  12. zenek2

    zenek2 Active Member Full Member

    832
    0
    Apr 7, 2011
    First haye should beat Adamek or Povietkin- then I have no problem, If he wins he's nr 3 HW in the world and should fight Vitali. Right now comparing haye's resume to Povietkins or Adamek's make you laugh- guys best win is Chisora.
     
  13. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    yeah, he avoided a guy with 13 wins. if not for the *** haye who said wlad was not allowed a warm up fight, chisora fight would have never been cancelled the first time and more of hayes games the 2nd time. keep leaving that part out troll
     
  14. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    No double standards.

    Mandatory is Mandatory and Voluntary is different.

    Vitali pulls out several times and than the WBC forces him to fight Rahman.

    Wlad fought Haye instead of Chisora another World Champion and much better opponent.

    Vitali retired to avoid Rahman.
     
  15. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006