Was Tyson really a great puncher, or just a fast/accurate puncher?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by locard, Nov 1, 2012.


  1. locard

    locard Boxing Addict banned

    4,937
    9
    Nov 6, 2011
    Agree, stellar opposition (in their prime) dont get blasted out of the water just like any random bum.

    Unless they're Floyd Patterson
     
  2. Clarky Cat

    Clarky Cat Stalwart Full Member

    2,279
    0
    Oct 8, 2010
    He's praised for his accuracy and efficiency though.
     
  3. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,571
    Nov 27, 2010
    When Tyson slowed down in his later career and was unable to punch effectively in combination, he scored plenty of one punch knockouts (Botha, Etienne, Mathis, Savarese for all intents).

    Even in his prime it was often one punch that set things in motion.

    You can go round in circles regarding where to place his power in relation to Foreman, Shavers, etc, but to suggest that he was anything other than a huge puncher is ridiculous. No one walked through Tyson's punches (not even Holyfield), and even when completely shot his opponents had respect for his power.
     
  4. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,661
    Jul 8, 2010
    Tyson was capable of getting knockouts with glancing shots and stopping guys late in a fight when tired and heavy legged. He also carried his power throughout his career, even when his speed went and he was no longer able to throw the sorts of vicious combinations that made him so dangerous in his prime. The fact that he was so fast and explosive masks to some extent his raw power (pure power, if you like), but I think his later fights are proof enough that he had that in spades as well.

    Foreman had the sort of attributes that make him an interesting case to compare with, but nothing in Shavers's actual in-ring career supports the argument that he was a stronger puncher than Tyson.
     
  5. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    the person you were talking to was clearly a moron who's talking absolute rubbish. but then again, what did you expect on YT? they all talk rubbish there.

    tyson did throw fast punches, but they also had serious power on the end of them as well. it's not like you watch a tyson fight a come away thinking the opposite. it's as clear as day.

    hopefully you'll learn not to engage with that lot, as you won't get any sense out of them. they're nothing but trolls.
     
  6. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    that right hand over the top that he hit holmes with was something scary. how he got up from that i'll never know. holmes was badly hurt from that shot and was finished soon after.
     
  7. Espin88

    Espin88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    9
    Sep 28, 2012
    In terms of raw power id have Foreman and Shavers above Tyson, Tyson and Tua would be joint 3rd for me but Tyson was faster and more accurate than all 3.
     
  8. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Robinson has a nice CV where that's concerned, I think.

    LaMotta TKO13
    Fullmer KO5
    Zivic TKO10
    Olson (x3) KO12, KO2, KO4
    Turpin TKO10
    Graziano KO3
    Belloise TKO7
    Villemain TKO9
    Basora KO1
    Costner (x2) KO1, KO1 (He called himself Sugar)
    Rindone (x2) TKO6, KO6
    Jannazzo (x2) KO8, TKO2
    Shapiro KO3
    McDaniels TKO2
    Doyle TKO8

    Off the top of the dome...

    Around Six Hall of Famers and a bunch of long-rated contenders, most of whom topped out during their careers at #1-3.
     
  9. PivotPunch

    PivotPunch Guest

    I'm not saying that he wasn't a huge puncher because he was for sure but I think Shavers had (arguably) more power
     
  10. Blackness

    Blackness Danny Garcia Beat You... Full Member

    2,816
    0
    Apr 21, 2012
    Tyson had great power. And at his peak would have beaten anybody.
     
  11. SP_Mauler

    SP_Mauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,152
    8
    Aug 31, 2012
    HE had power,Cus/Rooney era he was dropping opponents with 2 or 3 body shots,He had huge shoulders,huge thighs and decent arms(bicep wasn't overly big)

    After prison he had huge everything chest,shoulder,arms were huge and I personally think lost his power,stamnia and some speed.

    PrePrison Great Power
    PostPrision Good Power
     
  12. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Tyson was a great puncher. He had all the intangibles. Power, speed, accuracy and timing. If that isn't a great puncher than there is no such thing.
     
  13. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    It isn't really that hard to drop someone with a bodyshot.
    Hit the liver and their legs turn into pancakes.

    Just hitting it in a fast paced fight can be quite a bother because you don't have time to really "aim" at it.
     
  14. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,513
    Sep 16, 2012
    Tyson is easily the greatest puncher in the history of boxing and perhaps mankind if you take power, velocity of thr punches, accuracy, ability to throw at angles and in combos into consideration

    No human that ever lived had the combination of punching ability, overall speed, punch resistance and defense that Tyson did

    At his peak he was at the top of every category
     
  15. Augustane

    Augustane Member Full Member

    204
    0
    Apr 29, 2012
    The main thing is that Tyson wasn't a huge hitter. Not in the way Big George Foreman was. He possessed terrific technique. He was able to apply his full leverage into every knock-out punch.

    I've talked to a few boxers and coaches in my area, they all agree, Tyson's knockout power came from his tight hooks/uppercuts and solid technique [his reputation in part, also].