I think "loyalty" depends on whether or not you cheer for a guy when he's on a high or on a low. Thus the loyalty of Mayweather's fans has never been tested, in my opinion. Loyal fans...I don't know...I'm thinking Hatton fans right now. Cotto too.
I prefer by far the people that are fans of the sport as a whole more than blind die hard supporters of one particular fighter. Some of them over time will transcend their blind adoration of a particular fighter and will become knowledgeable fans. In that regard it is good to see fighters like Paquiao attracting whole new populations to the sport. Certainly a lot of those fans are highly irritating but some of them will outgrow Pac and will stick to the sport after he retires.
I was just curious. Guys pls try to restrict yourselves to one or maximum two fighters, them being to close and almost a tie in fans loyalty.
Miguel Cotto Morales has plenty of fans, but they often come off like undergarment soaked so bad it shrank college aged groupies.
Most loyal in a positive fashion, Hatton. In a negative, Mayweather Jr. Idiots are like beaten wives who stick to their guy.
^gping **** Most loyal, who knows, Pacquiao and Mayweather have the most fanatical but neither has ever really been in the **** so it's hard to say I don't actually really understand the question tbh,are we asking if loyalty would consist of still watching a fighter after they've lost or are on a bad streak? Or rabidly defending them at all turns and insisting they'd beat everyone ever? If so Floyd emmanuel and k2 take the cake there