Who was better P4P in their prime Roy Jones Jr or Sugar Ray Leonard?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by OMGWTF, Nov 7, 2012.


  1. OMGWTF

    OMGWTF Guest

    What is the reason for your choice?

    Im going with Roy Jones Jr because he was too fast, and too dominant, in his prime he didnt really get tested and that wasnt because the competition he faced was sub par (Hopkins, James Toney etc) but because he was so unbelievably good.

    Sugar Ray Leonard never enjoyed this kind of dominance.

    Thats why I pick Roy Jones Jr.
     
  2. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    5,332
    5
    Sep 6, 2010
    Ray.

    He actually fought THE BEST out there.
     
  3. OMGWTF

    OMGWTF Guest

    Jones fought the hardest fighters of his era, Hopkins and Toney are P4P amazing fighters in their own right.
     
  4. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,534
    3,738
    May 4, 2012
    Prime Roy was unbeatable.
     
  5. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
  6. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,534
    3,738
    May 4, 2012
    Yup. And no fighter was moving up 10+ lbs and beating Jones jr in his prime. :bart
     
  7. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
  8. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    :deal
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,081
    12,997
    Jan 4, 2008
    During a 3 year period, yes.
     
  10. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    55
    May 4, 2007
    Leonard for me. He has a better set of attributes against the very best, with his undentable chin, sharp punching, good finishing, overall speedand mentality. He is almost the ultimate all-round package.

    Jones is, in a way, the ultimate one-trick pony. He can be backed to the ropes, but his athletic ability in his prime makes this almost an impossible task. There's been many legendary men in boxing, though, and almost impossible is still possible.

    I feel Leonard does better against the very best, while Jones would look better against inferior opposition. Besides that, Leonard proved more.
     
  11. SouthpawJab

    SouthpawJab On his way up!! 4-0!! Full Member

    8,781
    20
    May 26, 2011
    Roy could fight off the ropes with the best of them. He used it as a strategy as it invited his opponent to come in straight lines. He was a perfect fighter...or as close to perfect as perfect can get.
     
  12. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    55
    May 4, 2007
    Not perfect in the least. He had a level of athleticism above anyone else before or since. Technically, there could have been a lot of improvements. A great fighter, on a great night, and he could have been taken.

    His flaws do not show up against anyone but the very best.
     
  13. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,534
    3,738
    May 4, 2012
    His countering and leading are as close to perfect as any other fighter as far as meshing it with offense and defense. He could make you miss just by a hair, and drop you on your ass with the first counter thrown.

    Or lead with ridiculously powerful hooks and right hands, and step to the side and hit you again, and again. Amazing.
     
  14. tezel8764

    tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

    7,875
    12
    Mar 28, 2012
    Montel Griffin exposed Roy.
     
  15. rusak

    rusak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,276
    30
    Sep 28, 2012
    Not really. Roy just had a really bad game plan in the first fight and still was going to win. Any time Jones lets his hands go, Griffin is getting bombed out.