wtf does 22 years of age have to do with anything? does that mean he continnues to get to beat up ww's, jww and shot has-beens? when does this stop? when hes 25? hes the wbc champ. now, are you going to answer my question of why canelo fought cintron instead of molina or are you just going to sit there with your shoe up your ass? yeah. thats what i thought. end it now or youll just keep getting your ass kicked.
My name is Wendy. I have a lot of fans from beating up cab drivers. Can i have a belt please, please? I can. Thank you. Now give me the easy road until I get older. We can always use my age as an excuse. Set me up with big fights so even if I lose I won't be ashamed or fully exposed. You guys here at the WBC are the greatest. Yours Truly, Wendy
22 years of age has a whole lot to do with it. He's progressing and being nurtured like every other hot prospect. When does it stop? Maybe when he fights Cotto or Mayweather LIKE HE'S ASKED FOR. God knows why Golden Boy didn't set him up with Molina -- his opponents are being set up carefully, no one is denying that, dumbass. Lara, technically, didn't beat him either. The only way that would be a problem is if we were proclaiming him to be the greatest fighter in the world, RIGHT NOW. Which I'm certainly not.
You're right -- every prospect in the world should be thrown to the lions in their first couple of fights. As if Lara was absolutely tearing through the division...
He sure proved more in his first 10 fights than your boy did in his first 35. It's over man. Let it go.:yep
you continue to not understand. you dont get to be nurtured when you are the champ. no one here would hate on canelo if he wasnt the wbc champ and he continued to cherry-pick and fight opponents that are at an obvious disadvantage. again, please explain why canelo fought cintron as a TITLE DEFENSE when molina was availalbe and carlos had already beat cintron that same very year. where does it state that TITLE DEFENSES should be against LOSERS as opposed to WINNERS. end it now, aaron contreras. because i have no problem throwing down a sustained can of whoop-ass on a canelo nuthugger.
He can't give you an answer. It's over man. He needs a KO to win and it's 1 second left in the fight.
The belts don't mean **** these days. Y'all don't get I'd probably rank Lara over Alvarez, as is. Doesn't mean Alvarez should be criticized. It was the WBC who wanted Alvarez to hold that belt, of course, due to his popularity.
you want some more? http://www.proboxing-fans.com/gabriel-rosado-canelo-alvarez-is-kind-of-a-joke_093012/ can you please explain to the tens of thousands of esb members why saul canelo alvarez chose to fight cintron instead of molina as a TITLE DEFENSE when molina was available and carlos had already defeated cintron earlier that same year? why would the wbc champ fight the LOSER of the molina/cintron fight insted of the WINNER? again, please explain.
Proboxng-fans.com, ranks Lara first in the division. I already told you -- the belt doesn't mean anything. So if the belt isn't worth a dime -- the challengers aren't gonna make any sense either. Boxers don't want belts, they want big paydays.
wtf? http://www.***********.com/sulaiman-canelo-face-vanes-lara-winner-2013--57642 suliaman is going to strip canelo if he doesnt fight vanes or lara. simply put, he and the wbc are sick of their(gbp/canelo) ****. are you this ignorant in real life or is this just a hangover day?