That was probably the most insightful thing you've ever said, but you're talking to a troll whose perceptions are altered from an acute David Haye semen overdose in theboy_racer. Don't bother.
Lewis has to be favourite and in general put on his best performances against bigger guys who could punch abit. However thats not to say wlad couldn't win id have it 60-40 lewis.
Sure is, Wlad beats up on a slow punchbag with a sturdy chin and this question appears the next day atsch
A troll? This is a troll thread No one in there right mind seriously thinks Prime Lewis wouldn't beat any version Wlad If they fought 10 times, Wlad might win once as it's heavyweight boxing.
Lewis all day, either side of his peak, if he got down the gym he could probably beat him now. Wlad not as good as his brother who lost to an ailing Lewis despite people rewriting history, he couldn't have continued much longer in that with those cuts. Peak Tyson, Bowe, Holyfield, Lewis, and even Ruddock all far superior to Wlad. I'd put Witherspoon above Wlad too and a lot of the other fighters from the 80s if they could have been bothered. Vitali probably could have mixed in higher company, but Wlad just a good 'European Champion'. Tell me any fighter on his resume a peak Frank Bruno for instance couldn't have beaten at that time?
I think VLAD is better in every way then LL . Except adversity . I think LL takes a beating early but finds a way to put an end to and KOs VLAD . VLAD is the better boxer but I beleave LL is the better fighter .:good
A not prime Lewis beats prime Vitaly, who is much better than Wlad. Why is this even a question? Lewis stops him.
Really! Mormeck 40, Thompson 41. He fights the same guys twice over. Why do people want to turn him into a great. Would a anywhere near peak Tyson lost To Lamon Brewster, no way..that's the standard.