Any version of Lewis beats any version of Wlad. Lewis wouldn't box him, he'd go for the kill from the off. Wlad would be too tentative early on and throughout (when isn't he tentative?), Lewis would have him out of there before he got started, 4 rounds at best. This would happen 9 outta 10 times. Wlad without a doubt is a quality, top drawer HW but Lennox is simply all wrong for him. More dynamic, better chin and simply the better fighter.
Lewis showed trouble when a fighter had a good jab, frank Bruno could trouble him for pretty long. He has to go inside Wlad because on the outside he's weaker.
Most people who've sparred with Wlad give Wlad the stronger right hand. Lewis is more accurate and better at combinations but his power is slightly lower, not that it's much.
He is swift enough, a prime uppercut could do the job in even the 1st or 2nd round, but Wlad would dance on him.
Here is another: Mercer landed 60% of his jabs on Lewis. Lewis was not that hard to hit - certainly not for Wlad.
As much as I like Lewis and Wlad. Would not say Lewis has the better chin! Look again at who lewis fought and did not fight and when he did fight them and why? I am certain you can figure it out! :deal If not sorry, guess you not a real boxing fan!
You're right, Lamon Brewster/Ross Purity/Sanders definitely better than holyfield, morrison/Rahmon/Tyson/Grant/Tua/Briggs/McCall/Golota/Mercer/Vitali btw, tko6
You have to look at not only who Lewis fought but WHEN! And who did LEWIS not fight and why? Asking a real question here. Look for yourself!
nah you are full of ****. Wlad is just too fast for Lewis an he hits way harder than Rahman or McCall or Briggs.