Is Donald Curry underated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TheSouthpaw, Nov 16, 2012.


  1. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    He was a great fghter, and his Fight with McCallum is a sight to see, but he never a got a shot against a fighter with the likes of a SRL. Does this hurt his legacy, or does his phenomenal talent speak for itself and automatically put him at Greatness?
     
  2. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    He was a superb fighter.
    But he lost to Lloyd Honeyghan and Mike McCallum when he was supposed to be taking over from Marvin Hagler as the world's greatest fighter pound-for-pound. In fact he was tipped to succeed Hagler as middleweight king.

    If he's not held in the greatest esteem it's because of his LOSSES in his prime, not necessarily a lack of wins.
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    He was excellent in his prime...before the Honeyghan fight. But essentially, that's it. he was an excellent fighter...not a great one.
     
  5. Bollox

    Bollox Active Member Full Member

    1,484
    9
    Mar 12, 2010
    He came down with a thud didn't he. I felt sorry for him at the time and still feel sorry for him now. The expectations on him were enormous considering some of the boxing mags at one point replaced Hagler with Curry as their #1 fighter in the sport. He'd himself talked about usingg 154 as a stepping stone before challenging Hagler. But he never made it at 154. Maybe we under-rate his prime, which seemed to end in about December 1985 when he defended against some guy (Eduardo someone?) and he was being hit with punches that wouldn't have landed previously

    p.s by all accounts he's a decent guy
     
  6. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Damn good fighter, but if he was getting floored by Jun Sok Hwang, something was wrong, first red flag.
     
  7. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,802
    11,430
    Aug 22, 2004

    Nah, I don't agree with that. He caught a punch and briefly went down. Not a huge thing. He went on to have his most significant, impressive victories over far, far better than Hwang after this brief scare.

    Guys get hit, and sometimes the best even go down. In this case, it means nothing about anything. Joe Louis went down too....more than once. Was that any kind of red flag?
     
  8. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    After what McCallum did to him I dont think he wanted anypart of Haglar, even though at the time Curry was still the top Contender.
     
  9. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Well said my man..There was no need for the 154 steppin stone, he shoulda stayed at WW:good
     
  10. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    I agree...Hwang is irrelevant...
     
  11. anj

    anj Guest

    I don't feel he is underrated. He was performing better than Mike McCallum until he got ko'd, however I just cant call him a 'great' fighter as he lost to all of the great fighters and the wins he did have were not against 'great' but 'good' fighters. Therefore, Curry is a very good fighter.
     
  12. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    @ anj..Those losses may be the reason why he never fought Haglar or Leonard.
     
  13. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    Tough to argue with this post. I have always been high on curry and pick him to beat hagler if they fought in 85/86 with a stopover at 154. REALLY wish it happened. Hate saying it but i feel honeyghan ruined him
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,254
    25,601
    Jan 3, 2007
    An outstanding welterweight talent, who defeated good quality opposition very early on. Unified a title and beat most of the best men around. Problem is, he was one of these guys who burned very bright for a very short period of time, and history is not always kind to those.
     
  15. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,546
    7,146
    Aug 17, 2011
    he was a real solid pro and had a very strong run, but he was far from 'great.'