Broner officially cracks P4P. Ahead of Froch!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dwighttsharpe, Nov 19, 2012.


  1. dwighttsharpe

    dwighttsharpe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,306
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    Sports Illustrated P4P

    Broner #12 p4p

    Froch #15

    :lol::rofl:lol:
     
  2. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010
    What in the name of ****.
     
  3. Not sure what you are laughing at?? The fact that Broner who has not fought stiff opposition YET is ranked higher than Froch.
    Or
    That some supposed sports magazine has acctually ranked him there..
    Either way its totaly stupid as FRoch has had more title defenses than Broner has had fights ( JOKE )
     
  4. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Top 15 not farfetched, but shouldn't be ahead Froch! That's not right!
     
  5. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    ****ing morons


    Froch is one of the best fighters in the world



    Broner needs a year or 2 to get to that level
     
  6. WatchfortheHook

    WatchfortheHook Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,944
    0
    Feb 24, 2010
    This is stupid.

    For all we know Broner MIGHT be one of the best fighters in the world. But ya gotta earn it.

    And you don't earn it by beating Demarco.
     
  7. bristols_jim

    bristols_jim Member Full Member

    397
    0
    Apr 17, 2009
    Froch should blame Khan for this. He must be involved somehow.
     
  8. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,936
    3,280
    Apr 26, 2010
    No disrespect but I mean Froch has lost 2 of his last 5 fights...I don't advocate Broner being ranked higher, and I respect the he'll out of Froch but he's lost against the two best fighters he's faced.
     
  9. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    :lol: Defend him whenever possible, won't you. Give it a rest and stop trying to slyly justify it.
     
  10. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Doesn't make sense.
     
  11. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Froch? The guy who should've lost a decision to Dirrell? The guy who got beaten by past it Kessler? The guy who got shut out by Andre Ward? All at super middle? How could Froch be considered on a pound for pound list when he's not even close to being number one in his own weight division?
     
  12. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    1. Floyd Mayweather JR
    2. Andre Ward
    3. Juan Manuel Marquez
    4. Sergio Martinez
    5. Manny Pacquaio
    6. Wlad Klitschko
    7. Nonito Donaire
    8. Timothy Bradley
    9. Yuriorkis Gamboa
    10. Abner Mares

    11. Miguel Cotto
    12. Vitali Klitshcko
    12. Carl Froch
    14. Brian Viloria
    15. Adrien Broner
    16. Anselmo Moreno
    17. Chad Dawson
    18. Danny Garcia
    19. Saul Alvarez
    20. Orlando Salido
     
  13. I ain't gonna call you names, you can have an opinion. But its time to come down from having your head in the clouds..Kessler you say was passed it so in that case Wards victory over him is meaningless. Froch beat Dirrell, Deal with it. And he has by far better fighters on his resume than Broner.. And you then heave the balls to say he is not even close to being #1 in his own Division lmao When he is Ranked #1 below the Champion Ward
    Keep hating on British fighters if you like but it shows that, that is all it is.. NO FACTS just pure spitefull BILE
     
  14. Look who it is Royal Turd Bag... with his made up version of his ***** fancying ranking LMAO
     
  15. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Good lord. I know Broner is prolly going to surpass froch in terms of skills but he haven't beaten enough elite fighters to be place in front of Froch.