Why Have Adamek and Haye Never Fought?

Why do clowns like you automatically call everything hate? Look at the garbage you post about Adamek FFS. You see, unlike ******s like you, I like BOTH Adamek and Haye. Grow up, grow a pair, and chill the eff out. This is stricly why they never fought. And NO ONE said Haye MUST fight Adamek, but it would have been a good fight between two top contenders. What more do you ask for?
And the fact that you are pleased at hate, seeing posters say things about the fighter you love, pretty much says all one needs to know about you.

 

Ask Haye and he would tell you something like this:
"why would I fight Tomasz Adamek when I only want a fight with Vitali Klitschko?
I've already been cruiserweight champion and a heavyweight champion so I've done more than I ever though I would do. If Vitali doesn't fight me I'll call it a career because I'm old. But if he does fight me,I'm will Knock him out in six rounds because I'm too fast and strong."-David Haye

 

High risk high reward.

The high risk part is what scares Haye.

 

Why.. Why would there be any risk for Haye in this matchup? Adamek could've got put out in 1 round by Vitali.. Instead he carried him for another 9 then knocked him the **** out. Haye went 12 with the bigger, stronger, harder hitting, better skilled Klitschko and took maybe 3 or 4 flush punches.. Haye's reflexes and power would have Adamek out cold twitching like Montiel in 4 rounds. He would never fight again.

He probably never fought Adamek because he was more interested in winning and defending the WBA title whilst Adamek got gifts against Arreola and Michael Grant.

 

Gifts? GTFO here with that crap. At least watch the fights before sprouting such nonesense. And yes, Vitali CHOSe to carry him for the whole fight. Makes sense, great vision you have. atsch FFS....some fans are are just too ****in stupid to take serious with all the bul**** conspiracy theories.

 

Don't forget the gift against one-armed Eddie Chambers...

 

have you even bothered to watch those fights?

 

Vitali admitted after the fight he deliberately prolonged it because his last fight with Solis only lasted a round & he didnt want to embarass Adamek infront of his hometown fans.

 

Lance is such a ****, it's unbelievable

 

Of course.. How could I forget.. I don't think this counts because it was outside the mighty WBA Regular reign of Haye. Adamek's career should be littered with defeats, but isn't, purely and simple because he fights in Poland away from Poland (not in England., Jersey.. I'm actually surprised anyone lives in Poland anymore considering the amount live everywhere else.

 

Chisora - looks good in losing to Vitali - terrible fight for Haye

Adamek, looks terrible in losing to Vitali - great fight

 

That fight would be one of the worst style matchups ever and if it ever happens & Adamek isn't KTFO I will leave this site forever, or have an avatar that says I love ****

 

Seriously? , Jackass.

 

Adamek is overlooked in every fight really, that's nothing new. Just hope this fight happens and hopefully you will remember your bet after it. Sad part is, I don't think Haye would care for it. Let's face it, Haye's campaign at heavyweight has been a circus based on comedy and trash talking, as a Haye fan myself this is the truth whether we like it or not. Adamek would be risky fight with not enough reward for what Haye is looking for and we all know what that is, money and short-lived attention. There's a reason Chisora was worth fighting all of a sudden despite him only having 18 professional fights.