Ayala vs. Roldan

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by laxpdx, Aug 4, 2008.


  1. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    If they gunned with each other instead of Hagler....
     
  2. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Roldan is too strong for the inexperienced and tempermental Ayala.Juan stops Tony in the fifth round, but if I was him, would not want to deal with Tony after the fight, could be fatal for him.
     
  3. D9Garrard

    D9Garrard Active Member Full Member

    597
    41
    Oct 21, 2008
    I have more faith in Ayala's technique and punching power, not sure about his mental toughness at that period or durability.
     
  4. Senor Pepe'

    Senor Pepe' Boxing Junkie banned

    9,408
    45
    Mar 14, 2012
    Juan Roldan 'beats' Tony Ayala bad.

    Same result as the James Kinchen bout.
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    Ayala would need much more experience to beat a guy like Roldan who had a lot of experience and was one of the harder punchers in the 1980s at middleweight. The only reason he didn't win a belt is because he fought Hagler,Hearns and Nunn.
     
  6. AREA 53

    AREA 53 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    83
    Apr 10, 2006
    Roldan Hammered Frank Animal Fletcher without any qualms, i dont think he is going to be too worried about a fleshy Lt Middle.
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    this one could have happened. Had Tony been around longer, wouldve moved up about this time

    I see it like a Foreman-Cooney fight, both with about the same size & style, and both destroyers. I would hate to be the ref that came between them

    i sometime wonder about Roldan tho :huh

    he was taken out one punch by another of Tommorrow's Champions, Alex Ramos, in the amateurs

    he stuck his head up for a moment, the next he was lying flat

    hate so say it but I think Roldan wins unless Tony improves his defense
     
  8. Curtis Lowe

    Curtis Lowe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,597
    1,067
    Feb 19, 2006
    Roldan and Ayala swap punches for 7 rounds then Ayala realizes that Roldan isn't going away. Ayala quits on his stool or his Dad throws in the white towel.

    Ayala is immensely overrated.
     
  9. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    thing about Roldan is that he lost to quick fighters. He was not very defensive because he was always punching. He was a rare windmill of a puncher and he punched hard. If a guy was not fast then they would not beat Roldan. He usually outpunched and mauled guys who were as fast as him. He destroyed Kinchen and Fletcher. Had he fought a guy like Hamsho or Barkley who knows how he would do. They were not as fast as Hearns,Nunn and Hagler.
     
  10. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    IMO, a prime Roldan would probably wear out Mike.

    Also, he had Tommy on the verge of dreamland until he got sloppy and completely dropped both hands by his side
     
  11. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    Tommy got smart. Roldan was getting tired a little and Hearns started to throw that left to the body and that made Roldan lower his left and Tommy landed his last right hand . Hearns was close to beating stopped. Those were the years Tommy's legs started to decline a little and he started to get hurt more. But Roldan was so wild.
     
  12. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    Tommy's slip started to show with Medal & Dewit. He looked especially flat at lthvy. I think too much moving around hurt him in the same way it hurt Roy Jones

    As for Roldan, he was never the same again after the Hagler fight which I thought he did well in. One loss and some fighters are never the same.
     
  13. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    yeah Hearns slipped after Hagler a little. and so did Hagler. Those kinds of fights are exciting but they take something out of fighters. Who knows why. A lot of it has to be mental.
     
  14. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    But it wasnt Hagler who messed him up. Physically he was at his peak

    Hearns messed up cuz he kept moving around wt classes. He looked great until he moved down & messed with Medal who was as weak a challenger u could find

    Tommy looked drained & tired early. after that he never regained his form. it happens to fighters a lot. Same with Roy Jones
     
  15. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    yeah I see your point. He did go up and down, but he did fight Andries and Hill pretty well, but he was not the same on his legs as he was before I agree. Tommy did not have the same quickness as before Hagler which I am not sure was because of Hagler or like you say moving up an down so much. He fought here at 154 in June and in March of 1987 he fought at light heavyweight and won that title.

    But yeah he lost something. He was more prone to brawl after Hagler because his speed was not there as much so he had to struggle to land the same punches. Medal was an ok fighter, obviously not in Hearns class, but they were trying to find an opponent for that triple hitter card and Medal came up. Who had been an IBF champion before and fought a good fight with Santos. It had been hot and I think Hearns almost had Medal out of there in round one and he decided to slow down and pick him apart and it was a boring fight but he won it by stoppage in I think 8 rounds right? I have to go look at the results.