Is Ricky Hatton an ATG?

ATG hell no

Great, not really

HOF, yes, combination of ability and fanbase, impact for boxing.

Yes, he is up there with the Greats of Boxing
No, he is a mediocre brit who just had hype

Neither, these options are very limited and poor.

 

Hall of Famer with a string of really good wins, but he lacks a defining over an ATG.

 

:deal


HOF for what he acomplished

But not even close to an atg

 

:deal

 

:deal

It's actual getting beyond sad the amount of time the op spends attempting to put down British fighters.

 

his best wins are Tszyu, Paulie and Castillo, lost to May and Pac

solid fighter, for sure, but not ATG material, not voting, OP you could of given more subjective choices

 

Tszyu was 36 and past his prime

 

**** I voted yes but I thought it said HOF

definate HOfer

 

Urango was a better win than Malignaggi, even Maussa was better than the Castillo win, but you can't blame Hatton for KOing Maussa, Maussa held one of the belts.

 

He's not being serious you only need to look at his post history to see his agenda, it appears he's hoping that by his overrating of Hatton everyone else will put down Hatton's achievements.

 

He's one of the best at 140. It should be noted that I don't think highly of 140.

 

He never would have been "great," but he definitely robbed himself of several more years as an A-level fighter at 140.

 

That floyd loss destroyed him emotionally and the pac fight pretty much was the icing on the cake, am i wrong?