How the WBA could have increased their credibility..............

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Nov 26, 2012.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,081
    8,468
    Jul 17, 2009
    .......................when Muhammad Ali announced,what we all hoped would be,his final retirement on 27/6/79. Just picture this announcement from the WBA -

    "Now that Muhammad Ali has announced his retirement,thus vacating our title,John Tate and Gerrie Coetzee will fight an eliminator in October to decide which of them will be our number one contender. The WBC holder,Larry Holmes,has already proved himself to be a worthy successor to Muhammad Ali. He is defending his belt against Earnie Shavers in September. We will recognise the winner of that bout as our own champion"

    Would n't that have been good if the WBA had gone ahead with that ?
     
    Stevie G, Nov 26, 2012
    Stevie G, Nov 26, 2012
    #1
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,663
    21,273
    Sep 15, 2009
    Really they should have followed suit with the wbc and stripped Ali in the first place after his succession of gifts.
     
    lufcrazy, Nov 26, 2012
    lufcrazy, Nov 26, 2012
    #2
  3. Senor Pepe'

    Senor Pepe' Boxing Junkie banned

    9,408
    45
    Mar 14, 2012
    Stevie G,

    That means, the WBA would have had to show 'integrity'.

    Dr. Elias Cordova and Rodrigo Sanchez (WBA Officials in 1979)

    There wasn't enough room in their pockets for 'integrity'.
     
    Senor Pepe', Nov 26, 2012
    Senor Pepe', Nov 26, 2012
    #3
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,148
    Oct 22, 2006
    Increased credibility? It is impossible to times anything by zero and get any answer other than zero...

    Everything worked out fine. Tate, Weaver et al made better money claiming a 'world title'. Whilst anyone with half a brain for the sport knew who the 'real' champ was, at the latest after Holmes beat Ali.

    The problem is today's environment, where there is a vacant title, and the two stand out contenders (understandable) will not fight each other.
     
    TBooze, Nov 26, 2012
    TBooze, Nov 26, 2012
    #4
  5. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,081
    8,468
    Jul 17, 2009


    Bloody true,Pepe :good

    Stlll,we can but dream.
     
    Stevie G, Nov 26, 2012
    Stevie G, Nov 26, 2012
    #5
  6. Senor Pepe'

    Senor Pepe' Boxing Junkie banned

    9,408
    45
    Mar 14, 2012
    Stevie G,

    Lets back up 1-year.

    How about if the WBA makes Leon Spinks defend his title versus Ken Norton
    like he was supposed to, instead of giving Muhammad Ali a rematch in September 1978.

    Muhammad Ali was the ruination of many rules, regulations and obligations - that
    affected many aspects of the sport of boxing.
     
    Senor Pepe', Nov 26, 2012
    Senor Pepe', Nov 26, 2012
    #6
  7. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,081
    8,468
    Jul 17, 2009


    As big a fan as I always was/am of Ali,I admit that Spinks defending against Norton would have been the right thing to do. However,the Ali rematch was decided by the almighty buck.
     
    Stevie G, Nov 26, 2012
    Stevie G, Nov 26, 2012
    #7
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,663
    21,273
    Sep 15, 2009
    In todays environment very few would class wlad as a standout contender.

    Holmes never fought his number 1 contender neither but at the point wlad beat iggy he'd beaten both the number 2 and 3 heavyweights. Then vitali came back and made it clear he didn't contend wlads championship status.
     
    lufcrazy, Nov 26, 2012
    lufcrazy, Nov 26, 2012
    #8
  9. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,148
    Oct 22, 2006
    So are you saying Norton/Holmes were not the two best of the time? Add that to the Ali victory, and Holmes was credible IMO. The brothers Klitschko beat everyone but their main rival (the other brother, for those being dim).
     
    TBooze, Nov 26, 2012
    TBooze, Nov 26, 2012
    #9
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,565
    Nov 24, 2005
    I think Don King suggested something like that.
    Tried to get Tate and Holmes to fight for the vacant WBA title.

    Of course, the WBA were in Bob Arum's pocket at the time on these matters. And King had the WBC.
     
    Unforgiven, Nov 26, 2012
    Unforgiven, Nov 26, 2012
    #10
  11. Senor Pepe'

    Senor Pepe' Boxing Junkie banned

    9,408
    45
    Mar 14, 2012
    The WBA should have pulled the 'plug' on Muhammad Ali, the night
    he walked into the ring with Alfredo Evangelista.

    But, no - the sanctioning fee's went for lavish vacations on the French
    Riviera for the top WBA Officials.

    True Story,,,,,
     
    Senor Pepe', Nov 26, 2012
    Senor Pepe', Nov 26, 2012
    #11
  12. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    ...by not charging 10,000 of a $12,000 purse to sanction a non-title fight
     
    dmille, Nov 26, 2012
    dmille, Nov 26, 2012
    #12
  13. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Terrible, terrible challenger. No other heavyweight champ would ever give Evangelista a shot at the WBC belt...
     
    LittleRed, Nov 26, 2012
    LittleRed, Nov 26, 2012
    #13
  14. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    I'm sure 33 years latter the WBA would have done something or should I say things to ruin whatever credibility they might have gotten.
     
    ripcity, Nov 26, 2012
    ripcity, Nov 26, 2012
    #14
  15. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,081
    8,468
    Jul 17, 2009

    Or Scott Frank for that matter !! ;)
     
    Stevie G, Nov 27, 2012
    Stevie G, Nov 27, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 2