Jmm lost the 1st one/pac badly needs a ko

I watched it again today and scored it 113-112 for Marquez. And I gave 2 rounds to Pacquiao that I had to watch a few times to decide (and still wasn't too sure Pac won them).

There's no possible way Pacquiao won that first fight, a draw is the best case scenario for Manny. Marquez took over from rounds 3 onwards. You can argue he won Round 2 as well.

Here are my scorecards from today:

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

^ scored it exactly how this guy above me scored it... Except giving Pac the 9th instead of the 12th

 

Stigma?? :huh

This is boxing.

 

Nice sentence structure there bud. Boxing is scored by individual rounds, not by the stigma of previous ones.

"learn Boxing then." :dead:dead:dead:verysad

 

What? Well, at least we certified that you are an idiot.

For the last time, I scored it 113-112 for Marquez. If I scored by 'stigma', I would've had Pac winning on my cards.

I'm done responding to this fatuous thread.

 

Can't blame you man. Some rounds were hard to score. You had Pac being looking clueless at times and then just jumping on JMM but you can't tell if some of the flurries were landing. Then you had Marquez on the other end countering and looking like he was in control but Pacquiao landing the cleaner more solid punches.

 

But but but don't you get it. Itz teh stigmas that explainz teh universe.

 

This is a boring post-hoc rationalization for why people scored the fight for Marquez, a tired variant of the "You only scored it for Marquez because he exceeded your expectations" line. If anything, the footstomping argument is the one that needs to be resurrected by blind Pacquiao fans, as that one at least led to loads of unintentional hilarity.

 

You've certainly convinced me with this well-stated and well-supported argument.