To the Pacquiao fans who think Pac won the 1st fight due to a scoring error...

That's not the even card judge you dumb ****! Only the even card judge can make the difference between a win and the draw.

 

It doesn't get talked about because it didn't effect the result. Whereas the other error did.

 

Get over it, It was Officially a Draw.
Pacquiao vs Marquez 4 here we come!

 

None of you guys bothered to add up the scores.

The 10-8 for that 8th round is a typo by the journalist who wrote the article. Had judge Jutras scored the 8th a 10-8 for Pacquiao, his score would have been 114-110 Marquez.
Jutras scored that 8th 10-9 as it adds up to 115-110 as he had it.
Its just a typo by the author of the article.

But I do agree, the 10-7 is bashed repeatedly by HBO and *******s, but nothing is said of the blind mice who scored it 115-110 Pacquiao. Giving Pacquiao 7 rounds is absurd.
The other blind mice who scored it the very same way is HBO's own Harold Lederman, why am I not suprised! atsch

 

Of course they won't see anything wrong with it. The tards score every round for Pac 10-8 unless the opponent wins the round, then they score it 10-9 for Pac.

 

This content is protected

 

Judge Guy - Round 8 - Pacquiao 10-9 Marquez

This content is protected

 

i believe this thread has now been solved sufficiently.

 

hahaha.. wrong info TS..

 

i'd argue its no worse that the judge that gave 10 rounds to marquez. that is also terrible scoring.

The most accurate score imo that night is Pac by 1 point. An the judge who scored it even would have had it spot on it it wasnt for the error in the 1st round.

Marquez was the better boxer that night. But he was 5 points down after 2 rounds, so despite winning more rounds, still lost by a point imo

 

hehe

 

:deal

 

lol...

 

Not even close.. JMM winning 10 rounds is way more realistic than Pac winning 7.

Pac won about 3 rounds(4 if you're feeling extremely generous) and that one judge gave him about twice that.atsch