Judges had the score TOO WIDE but the RIGHT MAN won

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Knickerbocker, Dec 1, 2012.


  1. Knickerbocker

    Knickerbocker Active Member Full Member

    1,252
    0
    Jan 16, 2011
    Cotto lost but wow at the scores
     
  2. Yungkiid16

    Yungkiid16 Guest

    yeah them scores were too wide. Close fight in my book maybe I have to re watch.
     
  3. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    I had it 8-4 Trout.
     
  4. pokel123

    pokel123 Member banned Full Member

    408
    0
    Feb 20, 2011
    i had the fight 115-113 for trout maby a little wider for trout, but the right man atleast won
     
  5. Barrera

    Barrera Defeated Boxing_master Full Member

    17,775
    1,630
    Jul 13, 2012
  6. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,871
    34,859
    Jun 23, 2005
    Horrible ****ing cards
     
  7. Str8ryte

    Str8ryte Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,943
    95
    Apr 27, 2012
    I dont know what the **** you ******s were watching, that fight wasnt close. you sound like those dick riding commentators. Pathetic. Cotto got his ass kicked.
     
  8. beefman180

    beefman180 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,858
    2
    May 16, 2011
    117-111 was the right score.

    Called this when the fight got announced. Trout put on a great performance.
     
  9. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Thought the 117-111 was pretty accurate. The 119-109 score was ridiculous.
     
  10. Str8ryte

    Str8ryte Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,943
    95
    Apr 27, 2012

    Exactly. Im watchin the fight and the commentators were horrible along with the replays. They were ignoring all Trouts work just to show a bull**** Cotto punch that would barely land. They should be ashamed.
     
  11. Chappy112

    Chappy112 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,347
    10
    Nov 14, 2009
    I think 117-111 and 116-112 would be accurate. 119-109 is just crazy but at least the right man won.
     
  12. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    118 - 110 Trout

    Scores were right in my view.
     
  13. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Had it 116-112 Trout. 119-109 is a little ridiculous.
     
  14. BuckeyeKeel

    BuckeyeKeel New Member Full Member

    2
    0
    May 8, 2010
    before reading any responses, I gotta disagree re: too wide a margin...Cotto dialed up the pressure from ab R3-5, then appeared to take R6 off. I wasn't impressed with how Trout took advantage of it (or failed to), but still gave him the rd. From then on, however...Trout was increasingly effective and it seemed Cotto never caught a 2nd wind or w/e. Wasn't sure if it was due to the damage inflicted, or if he just didn't have it in him (anymore)...but Trout won the rest of the fight IMO.

    In fact, the panelists scores-updates @ R9 and 10 had me thinking I was letting my pro-Trout bias affect my own scoring...but, other than a 10-10 1st round, I was dead on w/ the 2 judges @ 117-111 (had 117-112).

    Trout's a beast! Cotto v. Canelo woulda been epic....pre-Margarito. I think AT will have a real shot @ a W. Depends on if Canelo is THAT good or not...will be a tougher test than VOrtiz, IMO. Will @ least make him earn it in 12!

    (sigh....if only Chad Dawson had this kid's moxie. Not sure why he reminds me of him so, bc I like him better after this bout. He's only gonna improve....)
     
  15. masterorder19

    masterorder19 Active Member Full Member

    668
    4
    Nov 3, 2005
    I thought Cotto won 2,3,4,5