How good was Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sandokan32, Dec 2, 2012.


  1. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,063
    3,645
    Jun 30, 2005
    Very good fighter, and an entertaining one. He was an excellent body puncher, he could box on the backfoot and also apply pressure. Not a big one shot guy, but a fighter with heavy hands who applied gradual beatings.

    Not a great fighter, but he was a very formidable one.

    While he lost clearly to the top two fighters of the era, he gave them decent fights and both of them were more banged up at the end of the fight than they usually were. Pacquiao looked afterwards like he got beaten in a mugging.

    I rank him a little below WWs of the past such as Ike Quartey, Simon Brown, and Marlon Starling.
     
  3. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    maybe without a kneebrace
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,508
    10,385
    Jun 23, 2008
    LMAO!

    Cotto beats the **** outta Berto, even a washed up Cotto.

    Berto is a ****in bum.
     
  5. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
    His best weight was 140.
     
  6. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    119
    Jun 30, 2008
    Yeah, I'm glad you agree, because...


    wait a minute...:blood












    WE AIN'T FRIENDS NO MO! :twisted:











    :|:|:|
     
  7. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,063
    3,645
    Jun 30, 2005
    Yeah, Cotto was far better than Berto.

    Berto just has some speed and pop. He doesn't have good skills and he's a dumb fighter.