Schaefer: Trout’s victory over Cotto isn’t enough to get him Canelo

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Badbot, Dec 4, 2012.


  1. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    Lol screw them. What type of BS is this. Canelo ain't sh!t
     
  2. BagsWithDust

    BagsWithDust Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,734
    1
    Dec 18, 2009
    I just want to see canelo vs a legit 154lber and truely see if hes good or not
     
  3. fatcity

    fatcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,931
    11
    Feb 26, 2005
    Trout can't draw **** and Cotto vs Canelo is a much more action packed fight-which is what the fight fans want to see.Boxing isn't always fair and you guys shoul;d know that.
    And by the way,why is losing a fight such a huge deal.The very best have lost a fight and come storming back.Cotto may just be one of those.:good
     
  4. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
    It will be Canelo Vs. Cotto in May.
    Trout Vs. Canelo in Sept.

    Alvarez Vs. Mayweather in Dec.
    Chill people...

    Poor Lara & Vanes tho...
     
  5. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    Promoters are amazing bs-artists.

    He just pushed Canelo's buttons.
     
  6. Jak Boxer

    Jak Boxer Active Member Full Member

    900
    0
    Dec 3, 2012
    What a sad sport this has become.

    I still wouldn't mind seeing Cotto / Canelo.
     
  7. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,256
    36,512
    Jun 23, 2005
    What a crock of ****. They know Trout would give Canelo hell and probably beat him so they will keep him away from Trout. Trout will become the Tim Bradley of 154 avoided and shelved.
     
  8. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things.

    51,097
    40,926
    Apr 17, 2011
    Sad to see people defending Schaefer.
    There is nothing wrong with a Canelo - Cotto showdown but what Schaefer said is just a load of bs.
     
  9. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    It's not though. Once Chavez won his title, he wasn't babied anymore, and soon enough went for the best guy. Canelo's been cherrypicking since winning the title, and yet is taken more seriously that Chavez was.
     
  10. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
    Who is the WBA's #1 JMW contender?
    (Is Floyd still the super champ?)

    Is Haymon protection uncle Floyd?
     
  11. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,442
    13,563
    Jul 28, 2009
    You know, I do like Canelo, as a fighter. I like his style and think he's a good fighter. But the people managing what he does...This, for instance, it's actually the very height of stupidity and hypocrisy they're trying to sell us, here. What a shame for him that he can't validly test his talents and hold that belt in a legitimate and respectable way. He's certainly worth a shot at not being a farcical champion.
     
  12. skoorydookatron

    skoorydookatron Active Member Full Member

    1,016
    0
    Aug 30, 2011

    I never said there was anything wrong with Canelo taking on Cotto if it gets signed I will watch.

    But that doesn't change the fact that Schaefers statement is BS and you know it.
     
  13. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007


    Yeah for real what an ******* !
     
  14. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
  15. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    377
    Feb 10, 2009
    How long til Canelo-Malignaggi?

    I said this a few days ago as a joke but the more I think about it, the more it seems right up GBP's street.