Schaefer: Trout’s victory over Cotto isn’t enough to get him Canelo

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Badbot, Dec 4, 2012.


  1. Undisputed

    Undisputed Cant G no other way Full Member

    6,482
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
  2. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    they are "all creaming their trunks" because they know that they cane beat the **** out of canelo...el corredor.
     
  3. kwilson71

    kwilson71 #MAYDAY Full Member

    3,858
    0
    Feb 28, 2012
    Damn he just spit in Cotto's face with this one.

    Beating Victor Ortiz gets you a shot but not Cotto? Lol

    Oscar and Richard are gonna ruin this kid legacy
     
  4. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    And he's right. To get fight Canelo, you have to do the following:

    - Come from one or two divisions below.
    - Be shot/past-prime.
    - Have very little chance of winning.

    Trout ain't done none of that ^^ and he's got the nerve to call him out? All he's achieved so far is beating an opponent that's far superior than any of which Canelo's faced.
     
  5. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    cmon, man

    if he was good he would be fighting vanes, lara, molina, kirkland, trout or angulo next. ****, ill take the 5'6" 39-year-old bundrage.

    everyone now knows that canelo...el corredor...is a straight-up *****.

    only the greatest clueless canelo nuthuggers are buying schaeffers ****.
     
  6. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    not at all.

    trout will end up fighting vanes, lara, kirkland, molina, angulo or rosado.

    you know, the real legit 154's.

    the biggest fraud in boxing, la perra corriendo, is going to be stripped and irrelevant.
     
  7. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    good grief.

    youre going to be the only one left on the canelo island soon enough
     
  8. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    I understand what everyone is saying but the bottom line is that Trout would get destroyed by Canelo anyways.
     
  9. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    2
    Mar 11, 2010
    Disgraceful piece of excuse making from Golden Boy. Disgraceful, cowardly and pathetic.
     
  10. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
    Cotto + Alvarez = $$$$$

    Trout is a Big Risk, Low Reward for Alvarez.
     
  11. Hell yeah!!! Cotto-Canelo is the fight we all want to see. Glad to hear this coming from Golden Boy.
     
  12. inmydojo

    inmydojo Member Full Member

    250
    3
    Jan 22, 2010
    Its finally becoming clear to people that GBP and Bob Arum are one in the same, only difference is GBP tries to fake like they give a **** about boxing. Bob "they can go **** themeselves" Arum openly doesn't give a ****. :yep
     
  13. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
    Canelo Alvarez, 42 Fights in his career, he needs more tune ups before facing a Real 154 Champion.

    :D
     
  14. 777ike

    777ike Active Member Full Member

    826
    0
    Apr 17, 2010
    damn that golden boy. if cotto won he would of fought canelo! now i see who canelo ran to after trout called him out.. Now im kind of missing don king.. atleast he made the fights happen then left your ass if you lost.. thats the way i'd rather have it than arum and schaefer acting like little girls..
     
  15. Miguel

    Miguel Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,604
    1
    Nov 29, 2012
    I didn't rate Canelo against Mosley, he's fought bums. GBP can continue to protect him but if people keep buying his fights - I won't pay for a Canelo fight until he's fighting someone worth fighting