Schaefer: Trout’s victory over Cotto isn’t enough to get him Canelo

Ortiz, Pwill, Kirkland, Cotto all found a way to step off the plate.

Floyd's next!

 

:huh I'm laughing because of the stupidity of the comment. Also laughing cause I know you know how stupid it was....I hope:blood

 

The servers would shut down here when that fight gets made. I mean when it's announced, we all know it's made of 100% china any time a moderately significant fight is taking place. It couldn't even manage Wlad-Wach. :verysad

GBP actually doesn't stand to lose much of anything with a Floyd fight and decision loss on his record to him, as opposed to these "no-name" contenders. The mexican fan base doesn't stop supporting fighters because they lost their "0" anyway, so I haven't a clue what they're so terribly worried about. ****, that goes for any real fan of the sport. I don't think Canelo is a coward. His promotion is making him look awful, though.

 

About you being a whinny ****:huh

 

The line about those guys stepping down was said in jest but the point stands.

Or are you laughing at the absurd notion that Floyd would duck a fight.

 

So you're going to play it that way:|

I just asked you a simple question

 

Whiny ****s! All of you! Hehe

 

I might be inclined to agree under most circimstances. After beating ex-champion Cotto. I'd match Trout with Kirkland or Angluo first. There are some diffrances here. First off there is the somewhat popular opinion that Cotto was compitive with Mayweather. I don't agree, but there is a good amount of people who think this. Secondly and most importantly is the fact that Trout beat Cotto in MSG, which if any boxer has a home stadium it's Cotto at MSG. Under the cirmstances Trout deserves a big fight such as Alvarez or Mayweather. He might not beat them, but he deserves a big fight.

 

Cotto could win? Is he really going to lose three in a row?