Jeffries v Quarry

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Apr 14, 2008.


  1. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,675
    Aug 18, 2012
    They also fought in much bigger rings in those days. Smaller more agile hwts were that much more difficult to catch. Tom Sharkey is considered an all time great that would have been champion if he were not fighting in an era of even greater fighters.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,800
    29,235
    Jun 2, 2006
    Because we don't happen to agree with you ,our posts are pure trash? You've produced ZERO evidence to back up your position yet we are mugs? Ok ,at least we know where we stand with you.
     
  3. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,419
    12,830
    Mar 2, 2006
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    What is the best footage of Jeffries and is it good enough to justify a Jeffries pick?
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,800
    29,235
    Jun 2, 2006
    Are you saying that Sharkey was more agile? He was certainly smaller. Sharkey was a face first brawler, whom a teenage Jack Johnson embarrassed in sparring,prompting Sharkey to say to his corner," tell him to hold his head up so I can hit it", to which they replied," you're boxing him , you make him hold his head up."

    Sharkey was one of the dirtiest fighters that ever got in a ring .
    After being comprehensively out boxed for nearly 3 rds by Choynski he began to blatantly foul. Sharkey beat a 158lbs Kid McCoy,who had him on the floor twice,and a Corbett who had been retired for 2 years, and not won a fight for 4 , which other great fighters did he beat ?
    Please don't say Fitz:patsch

    The rock of your argument is Rickard ,who was never hit by Jeffries, those that were, Corbett, Fitz ,Sharkey, Johnson ,all tabbed Choynski as the bigger puncher with Fitz a close second. Your other star witness Fleischer was not only never hit by Jeffries, I doubt he ever saw him land a punch in a fight, unless it was in his abortive comeback against Johnson.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,622
    27,311
    Feb 15, 2006
    The footage would not justify such a pick, but then it would not justify picking Quarry either.

    There is no default assumption in favour of the fighter who is known from better quality film.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,800
    29,235
    Jun 2, 2006
    Aaah , but you're forgetting the training clips of Jeffries throwing around his oaf of a brother. They conclusively prove Jeffries was not only Superman, he was a defensive genius.
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,622
    27,311
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,622
    27,311
    Feb 15, 2006
    They don't prove anything, but they do lend credibility to statments made by some contemporary observers about his speed and other qualities.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    I agree whole heartedly and that's why I havnt and can't make a pick.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,800
    29,235
    Jun 2, 2006
    Which should we believe the actual fight footage of Jeffries, or clips of him skipping, and throwing a sparring partner around?
     
  12. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,419
    12,830
    Mar 2, 2006
    With no justifiable film footage available on Jeffries, your opinion on his greatness is based on what you've been told. Is that correct?
     
  13. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Footage of Jeffries

    I read an article covering Eddie Machen back in the early sixties. It was mentioned that Machen carefully studied film of past fighters in passing. The author asked Machen to rate the old champs and he gave this rating

    1--Dempsey
    2--Johnson
    3--Louis
    4--Tunney
    6--Jeffries

    Machen remarked about Jeffries that he liked "his quick hands and combinations"

    I am pretty certain I am remembering that correctly.

    I have wondered myself what film convinced Machen of this. But there is a point in the Johnson fight in which Jeffries flurries with both hands and for a big fellow he threw a lot of leather quickly.
     
  14. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "your opinion on his greatness is based on what you've been told"

    There is also his record. Being champion for six years and retiring undefeated certainly makes Jeffries worth considering for high ranking.

    He certainly dominated the post-Sullivan and pre-Johnson era and he was praised as the best there had yet been in his own time.


    **Just curiously. Name the heavies who were champions longer and who retired undefeated?

    I can't think of one other than Louis.

    Any others?
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,622
    27,311
    Feb 15, 2006
    Yes but crucialy, it is not what I have been told by one person.

    I look at as many contemporary acounts as possible, and try to find the common themes.