They also fought in much bigger rings in those days. Smaller more agile hwts were that much more difficult to catch. Tom Sharkey is considered an all time great that would have been champion if he were not fighting in an era of even greater fighters.
Because we don't happen to agree with you ,our posts are pure trash? You've produced ZERO evidence to back up your position yet we are mugs? Ok ,at least we know where we stand with you.
Are you saying that Sharkey was more agile? He was certainly smaller. Sharkey was a face first brawler, whom a teenage Jack Johnson embarrassed in sparring,prompting Sharkey to say to his corner," tell him to hold his head up so I can hit it", to which they replied," you're boxing him , you make him hold his head up." Sharkey was one of the dirtiest fighters that ever got in a ring . After being comprehensively out boxed for nearly 3 rds by Choynski he began to blatantly foul. Sharkey beat a 158lbs Kid McCoy,who had him on the floor twice,and a Corbett who had been retired for 2 years, and not won a fight for 4 , which other great fighters did he beat ? Please don't say Fitzatsch The rock of your argument is Rickard ,who was never hit by Jeffries, those that were, Corbett, Fitz ,Sharkey, Johnson ,all tabbed Choynski as the bigger puncher with Fitz a close second. Your other star witness Fleischer was not only never hit by Jeffries, I doubt he ever saw him land a punch in a fight, unless it was in his abortive comeback against Johnson.
The footage would not justify such a pick, but then it would not justify picking Quarry either. There is no default assumption in favour of the fighter who is known from better quality film.
Aaah , but you're forgetting the training clips of Jeffries throwing around his oaf of a brother. They conclusively prove Jeffries was not only Superman, he was a defensive genius.
They don't prove anything, but they do lend credibility to statments made by some contemporary observers about his speed and other qualities.
Which should we believe the actual fight footage of Jeffries, or clips of him skipping, and throwing a sparring partner around?
With no justifiable film footage available on Jeffries, your opinion on his greatness is based on what you've been told. Is that correct?
Footage of Jeffries I read an article covering Eddie Machen back in the early sixties. It was mentioned that Machen carefully studied film of past fighters in passing. The author asked Machen to rate the old champs and he gave this rating 1--Dempsey 2--Johnson 3--Louis 4--Tunney 6--Jeffries Machen remarked about Jeffries that he liked "his quick hands and combinations" I am pretty certain I am remembering that correctly. I have wondered myself what film convinced Machen of this. But there is a point in the Johnson fight in which Jeffries flurries with both hands and for a big fellow he threw a lot of leather quickly.
"your opinion on his greatness is based on what you've been told" There is also his record. Being champion for six years and retiring undefeated certainly makes Jeffries worth considering for high ranking. He certainly dominated the post-Sullivan and pre-Johnson era and he was praised as the best there had yet been in his own time. **Just curiously. Name the heavies who were champions longer and who retired undefeated? I can't think of one other than Louis. Any others?
Yes but crucialy, it is not what I have been told by one person. I look at as many contemporary acounts as possible, and try to find the common themes.