Im sorry but most of that post, but particularly the bits in red, is a load of crap. Ask the likes of Morales, Barrera, Hatton, Diaz, DeLa Hoya, Cotto etc, he didn't just compete with them, he beat them. He got clocked by a perfect punch from an ATG counter-puncher when ahead on the cards, so he must be over-rated, no skills, hypejob, 'The great Filipino Hope to challenge Floyd' FFS. atsch
Deep down you're disappointed in Floyd. We both know it. Seems to be you that needs crutches to feel better.
I somewhat agree. Pacquiao is a product of great match-making. I could never understand how people had him ranked above Mayweather on the P4P list. I knew sooner or later someone would capitalize on his amateurish tactics. It just happened to be by my favorite Mexican fighter.
Morales was past prime and scholled him the first time. Barrera was a good win, all credit there. Diaz was nothing special. De la Hoya was dead man walking. He drained Cotto. Hatton had had just got his chin cracked by Mayweather and was snorting lines. My point is that, Pacquao was younger and clearly far more athletically gifted than Marquez and yet he arguably never could reallt beat him. The reason why is his lack of skills, and ring IQ.
The racism card didn't take long to show up. Favorite tool used by people without anything better to say. This is a boxing forum. And your avatar is a fat ass 50 bucks *****. And if she was white or latin or asian, she would still be a 50 bucks *****.
My avatar had nothing to do with my post, and Bladerunner is a know racist ***** who disappeared from thsi forum for a while because he was making a fool of himnself with stupid and incorrect posts. If you don't have anything to contribute to the discussion you can shut the **** up too!:hi:
Alot of truth in thread starter. Pac is very good but not nearly the legend he's made out to be. His best wins are over washed up legends.