NY Times suspicious of Márquez

This content is protected

Give this man two years and I believe he will.

 

**** pacroid,..karma is a *****.

pacroid beat alot fo people cause of PEDS,..if jmm is on them then iam happy he did it against pacroid.karma baby,karma.

 

**** all these accusations. WTF cares about PEDS but Floyd. Also, Pac jumped into that punch as much as JMM hit him thats why He took a nap.

Great win for JMM and hope for another figh. If its going to be this exciting it would be great for boxing.

 

We'll see. But 2 years is a long time.

 

:happy:rofl:rofl

 

Ok but what about PAC- he's grown mascle mass and power as well
He got some of his own medicine-his vaunted punching power has to be questioned as well.
Legacies are tainted by PEDS and the art of passing the tests.
Bonds, McGuire -I believe the Jamaicans are suspect as well....clean up the mess and make sure they are legit fighters.

 

Good post-very true:good

 

Yup. And neither are large forearms. Is every buff person on Earth on steroids?

 

Hilarious hypocrisy from both sides of the fence. A few years ago it was apparently enough evidence, when a man in his late 20s/early 30s had moved up in weight successfully over a period of many years, to taint the rest of his career with PED abuse accusations (which I think are partially justified, despite how classlessly it was done) and now it's suddenly ridiculous to point an accusing finger at a 39 year old who has miraculously gotten into a kind of shape that he has never managed before in his 20 year pro career, and knocked out one of the P4P best whilst only managing one other straight KO in the rest of the last decade.

Let's be honest here, it's as plain as day who many of the people are that are defending JMM now. Many of whom were very quick to point the accusatory finger of PED abuse at someone else for the last few years. It's also as plain as day who most the people are that are now suddenly accusing JMM. It's comical hypocrisy all round. I'm kinda glad that it's all over, one way or another, so I don't have to sift through this **** that has surrounded the Floyd/Pac debacle for the last few years.

 

You have no ****ing clue what you're talking about. If you and i stand side to side, it would be very obvious who goes to the gym 6 times a week and who sits on their fat ass typing away on a message board.

The protein IS what gives me that weight. When I work out hard without it, I stay within the realm of 155-159, and i never tip the scales past 160.

When i start training harder with my added protein I start gaining massive weight, and it only takes me roughly 2 months to tip the scales at 170, which is where i'm at. Eating the same, everything else being equal, the protein is the difference.

If Marquez was on steroids, he wouldn't have that body, he would be much more ripped. I have friends that cycle on steroids, I've seen it for myself, in their physique and strength.

if posting pics of my before and after body wasn't so gay, I would post up.

p.s. judging from my strength and cutness I would say most of it is muscle.

 

It use to be the norm of the previous boxers of the golden age. Look at the fighter Kid Galaxy I think his name was dudes arms were huge ..It was the norm back then but with all these ped's its now a surprise to people ..

 

I just dont think pacquaio really recovered from the first kd.

Having bigger muscles does not make you punch much harder or take a shot better

 

The 80s and 90s clearly had a far worse problem with drug use. You would have to be incredibly naive to think that abuse wasn't rampant. You think that it being the norm in an era where testing was even more inadequate is some kind of evidence that modern fighters aren't using?