The Ring rate Broner #5 P4P

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Dec 11, 2012.


  1. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Mayweather
    Marquez
    Pac
    Martinez
    Ward
    Donaire

    Yeah, that's outrageous. Is Pac gone because of the KO now too? That seems too reactionary IMO.
     
  2. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    broner ahead of donaire lmao.
     
  3. The Joker

    The Joker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,594
    0
    Jan 14, 2009
    His resume shits all over Broner's. Thats reason enough.
     
  4. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,200
    28,089
    Jul 26, 2004
    **** is absurd. In the other thread about it, BoxedEars puts down some ring mag emails, Id suggest some fans at least write in asking them about it. Probably wont do anything but still :lol:
     
  5. The Joker

    The Joker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,594
    0
    Jan 14, 2009
    Flawed logic. Why isnt Gary Russell, Gamboa or even a Dirrell on that list then?
     
  6. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    I have to say that is the worst ring p4p list since I've been watching boxin
     
  7. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,200
    28,089
    Jul 26, 2004
    Exactly.

    Thats the whole point.

    If we went by who had the most talent.... **** Ill go ahead and goooo

    1 - Gamboa
    2 - Donaire
    3 - Russell
    4 - Dawson
    5 - Broner (RIng was right!)
    6 - Wlad


    This is exactly why p4p lists weigh both accomplishments and ability. However if you look at almost every official p4p list in the last 20 years, almost every single one has been about what that fighter has done. Not 'how much talent he has'.
     
  8. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    you are losing it
     
  9. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,200
    28,089
    Jul 26, 2004
    Same.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,408
    48,818
    Mar 21, 2007
    Broner above Donaire is a total ****ing disgrace.

    Based purely upon talent as a primary factor and achievment as secondary you could argue him top #6. But Ring has never based their rankings primarily upon talent. Until now.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,408
    48,818
    Mar 21, 2007
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  12. kwilson71

    kwilson71 #MAYDAY Full Member

    3,858
    0
    Feb 28, 2012
    I think ring lost his creditability a long time ago.
     
  13. Elliot

    Elliot Boxing Addict banned

    5,304
    0
    Jan 22, 2012
    This is a joke, even Broner fans aren't on board
     
  14. Collie

    Collie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,638
    8
    Jun 16, 2012
    Last time i did a list i jad broner at 10. Based in the reason that he is top at 130-135 and has very good skills, but a lot still has to be proven so 5 is way too high.
     
  15. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008

    I think it's ridiculous to have him at 5 but ima run with it and muhfuggaz are gonne be mad as **** about my avatar hahaha.