James Toney vs Chris Eubank At SMW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, Dec 12, 2012.


  1. sas6789

    sas6789 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,661
    107
    Sep 15, 2011
    Who comes out on top?
     
  2. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,705
    2,881
    Aug 12, 2012
  3. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,097
    15,575
    Dec 20, 2006
    This one has been done a few times....Toney comes out by the majority.....My pick has always been Eubank....7-5/8-4

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OW3zWZ12ZZY[/ame]
     
  4. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,705
    2,881
    Aug 12, 2012
    What do you believe Eubank has that could get the better of Toney? The only advantage Eubank has is power but that wouldn't be an issue since Toney has a great chin. He may well beat the Toney who fought Tiberi but that's the only time imo
     
  5. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009

    Or the shitty shell who Jones dominated at Eubanks best weight ?

    I pick Toney though, not alot but a bit better at most things.
     
  6. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,097
    15,575
    Dec 20, 2006
    First I believe Toney is way over rated....I think he was very good/ border line great (similar to how I feel about Eubank, as well), but not nearly as unbeatable (well, many think he would simply beat any one not named RJJ) as some make him out to be.

    Both are brilliant (IMHO) counter punchers, and I don't think this would be an exciting fight in any way....perhaps in the mold of RJJ/Hop's in that I don't believe either will risk a whole lot...Due to that I think Chris would be the busier fighter...I always felt Toney did himself a diservice by taking off far to many rounds and minutes at times inside of rounds, going back to McCallum and beyond. I think Chris's reflexes would frustrate Toney to a similar degree that RJJ did....I am not sure I would say Chris is more powerful, but in this fight the power of both would be negated by both chins and likely won't be a major factor....I like Chris's timing, speed, reflexes and athleticism to trump Toney's better fundementals, and defensive skills.
     
  7. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009
    You're right , it would either be a technical chess-match or a boring fight, depending on what type of fight you like.
     
  8. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,097
    15,575
    Dec 20, 2006
    Your answer does not elaborate reasons for why...so in return why do you think Toney would beat Eubank? Toney might be able to get the 30 y/o that lost Collins but that is about it!
     
  9. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,097
    15,575
    Dec 20, 2006
    I am not sure if boring is the right word, but no it probably would not be fan friendly with minimal risk assumed on either side. Brilliant perhaps, but likely only enjoyed by .....not sure how to phrase it?
     
  10. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Toney would've struggled with Eubank's movement. Eubank also had a TERRIFIC stiff jab - a Eubank/Toney fight would 100% depend on whether James could read it to avoid and counter or he'd be grinded down.
     
  11. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009

    You've said it right already. It'd be a fight for the purists.Not a chance of a knockout or a shut-out for either fighter.
     
  12. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,705
    2,881
    Aug 12, 2012
    Because like i said apart from punching power Toney has an advantage in most other things which should be enough to him the decision imo. As for Toney only being able to get to the Eubank that lost to Collins, what about the one that just got past Ray Close in 2 fights or even worse the one that got a gift decision against fat boy club fighter Dan Schommer?
     
  13. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009

    You can take everyones worst nights though cant you. Toney was in plenty of stinkers.It's usual in these fantasy match ups to assume they're at their best at that weight.
     
  14. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,097
    15,575
    Dec 20, 2006
    I assume???? that you have an anti- Chris agenda??? That is fine, I am just not interested in dealing w/ that disguised as a discussion. Chris has the power punching advantage (not sure how many agree)...and then you give every other area...without listing one....boxing is very rarely quite that simple, but if that works for you....(" Fighter a will beat fighter b becasues...well he is better at most things, is not an analysis.)

    As for the second part, you mentioned Tiberi, I merely mentoned Collins as a rebuttal to show that, it was a flawed statement from a logic position....Meaning we are taking the best version of both and placing them in a hypothetical....Your criticism on Eubanks further shows you didn't really want reasons or a discussion....as much as you wanted to further an agenda...

    Toney is a fine pick, I just still don't know why you pick him....except of course that he is better at most things whatever that might mean????
     
  15. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,705
    2,881
    Aug 12, 2012
    Yeah i know and i've given my reasons twice as to why i pick Toney. I only put Eubanks "worst nights" because philly said Toney would only get to the Eubank who fought Collins.