Jeffries Admits Munroe Did Not Merit Title Chance

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Dec 6, 2012.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,830
    29,278
    Jun 2, 2006

    Who says so?

    It seems certain that McCoy faked the knockout loss to win bets.
    Thats Box rec


    This content is protected




    "The adoration was short-lived, as his next fight, a five-round knockout over [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kid_McCoy"]Kid McCoy[/ame], was widely believed to be a fix."


    "August 30 - James J. Corbett KOs Kid McCoy, five rounds, Madison Square Garden. Rumors surface that McCoy took a dive. The question is never satisfactorily answered. The same day the Horton law, governing boxing in New York since 1896, is repealed by the Lewis Law. Boxing will continue in New York on a
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    membership basis only until 1911."



    The two in retirement below.


    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTbHplYRhYA[/ame]

    It seems certain that McCoy faked the knockout
    loss to win bets
    CBZ

    "The Corbett fight was the subject of controversy, as the ending was suspect and Corbett's estranged wife claimed the bout was fixed. That became the general opinion among New York sportwriters "
    In your previous post ,you made three threeads I ripped them to pieces , you havent even referred to them here!:patsch
    Par for the course really.

    Do you know, the only reason I bother baiting you is for the entertainment value. You are beyond a joke, you are farcical.
     
  2. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    It is an interesting thought though. McCoy was clearly the leading contender around the time of McCoy - Corbett, it seems. Quite clearly, imo.

    This win, pretty much does legitimise the Corbett Jeffries II fight if it is on the level, especially after Corbett Jeffries I. In fact, it may even be one of Corbett's best wins, quality of opponent wise. Though i suppose that Others might point to the delay between this fight and the Jeffries corbett, but i must admit, i am not that big on fighters losing their status due to inactivity, like others are. I think status needs to be earned by beating others with status.

    Of course, if it is a fake, what does this mean? Should McCoy really keep the no 1 status in light of a fake loss. Is there enough evidence to call it a fake. How bad would a Jeffries McCoy fight look if it had been taken after a corbett loss?
     
  3. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,248
    1,687
    Sep 13, 2006
    My book, In the Ring With James J. Jeffries, devotes a chapter to the Corbett-McCoy fight. The Horton law was not repealed as a result of this fight. It was already repealed, with such law set to go into effect Sept. 1. Hence lots of fights were happening before the repeal went into effect, because they knew that New York money was about to be gone. Corbett and McCoy had been previously scheduled to fight before Jim's father went insane and killed his wife and himself. Whether the fight was fixed or not remains unclear. I do not think there is any definitive evidence. Corbett denied it in his autobiography. The sportswriters who saw the fight believed it was legitimate. One said if it was fixed then it was the acme of acting. Keep in mind also that Corbett was bigger than McCoy, and was very sharp at that time - only some months after he gave Jeffries hell. Their wives accused them of fixing it, but they were estranged at the time. Plus, there were aspects to the wives' stories that didn't make sense or were contradictory. Still, many back then, including today, want to believe the worst. Many prefer the sensational. Sells more newspapers. Sometimes it is true, though. I lean towards thinking it was on the up and up, but maybe I'm naive.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,830
    29,278
    Jun 2, 2006

    Pollack believes the fight was legit, either way ,I don't think its that important really.

    For arguments sake, let's say it was on the up and up, it's still three years before Corbett fought Jeffries with no fight in between.That makes it ONE win for Corbett in nine and a half years.
    We have a three years retired ex champion who is a month off thirty seven years old, challenging a prime active champ, nearly ten years his junior ,who has a twenty seven pounds weight advantage over him.
    given these disadvantages, what sort of an fight would you expect him to put up?

    As it was it took Jeffries ten rounds to finish him.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,830
    29,278
    Jun 2, 2006
    Whether you are naive or not it matters little,Corbett was palpably finished when he fought Jeffries the second time , as such I can give Jeffries little kudos for the win.
     
  6. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,636
    1,912
    Dec 2, 2006
    Never could figure the truth of Corbett-McCoy myself, if for real its probably Corbett's best win as McCoy was as Boilermaker stated just about the number one contender. I suppose as such it's hard to see why he'd throw the fight. As to the substance of the thread nobody knew better than Jeff that Munroe wasn't up to much, and he wasn't. He was however well ballyhooed and this fooled a lot of the public and indeed some sportswriters.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,830
    29,278
    Jun 2, 2006
    A balanced opinion, makes a pleasant change here.:good