Wow! I'm surprised how much support Carlos Molina is getting from U.K fans on twitter

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Dynamito_2012, Dec 13, 2012.


  1. simmo

    simmo Active Member Full Member

    849
    1
    Feb 18, 2012
    The racism card just doesn't wash in boxing - the most revered British fighters are massively verier: Eubank, Benn, Bruno, Lewis, Hatton, and the list goes on. Everyone loved Danny Williams and he's a devout Muslim, the simple fact is British people generally don't like arrogance unless you can back it up (hello Naz).

    I think on Saturday Khan will win and then proclaim himself the second coming again, even though he's fighting a fairly average fighter.
     
  2. ollyc

    ollyc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    0
    Jul 17, 2009
    You might not. But lots of people on here do. He has far more fans on here then Khan - who seemingly has about five fans on here.

    Khan has beaten Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana and Judah. He won the WBA & IBF belts. He was quite rightly ranked as the number two fighter in his division at one point. He has achieved far, far more than most British fighters in the past decade.

    Like who?
     
  3. True_Hero

    True_Hero Guest

    All a bunch of decent boxers who are a good step behind the upper-echelon of the lightweight/light-welterweight division. Just like Khan't. Khan't is a decent boxer, but who is a good step behind the upper-echelon yet is hyped up like the British Mayweather.


    Like who?

    Carl Froch - Proven himself against the best but still gets nowhere near the amount of media attention Khan't does.

    Frankie Gavin - Showing much more promise than Khan't did at this stage of his career but again, is getting little media attention.

    Kell Brook - Has already surpassed Amir Khan't but is little known beyond boxing fans whereas Amir Khan't is a known face across Britain.

    Dave Price - Could become the #1 heavyweight in the world imo yet gets very little media attention.

    All 4 of those are much better and much more promising than Amir Khan't. Before Khan even stepped into a professional ring he was hyped up as the second coming, receiving almost as much media attention whilst he was fighting Schmuck's like Action Jackson than Froch was when fighting Abraham.

    Come on, you can't deny this kid has been overhyped way beyond his talent. He's a decent boxer, but nothing more and showed early on in his career when he got floored by Limmond and beat by Prescott that he was never going to be anything more then decent.
     
  4. Mervin Hagler

    Mervin Hagler Member Full Member

    212
    0
    Mar 22, 2012
    Thats a lie I know Molina he is a great Heavyweight
     
  5. larsker

    larsker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,342
    79
    Jun 5, 2010
    I hope Khan gets KTFO like Pac this Sat.
     
  6. ollyc

    ollyc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    0
    Jul 17, 2009
    :lol::lol::lol:

    Gotta be an alt.
     
  7. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    Ive seen what you've done there....very clever, or it was about 5 years ago when people first started using it, now its just a bit lame and tired.

    :lol: After 4 years as a pro Khan was fighting Kotelnyk for the WBA lightweight title....Gavin is fighting an 11-1 fighter called Jason Welborn....Good luck Frankie :thumbsup

    :lol: just :lol:

    Its hardly anyones fault that Price has the personality of an MFI self assembly wardrobe and a face made for radio is it? Its completely ******ed to blame Khan for Prices inability to make a media impact. Its his ****ing promoters job to get his profile out there, the clue is sort of in the job title....blame Rumpelstiltskin for that :deal
     
  8. fita

    fita Member Full Member

    144
    1
    Oct 7, 2007
    Excellent post my friend. I agree with pretty much every point made.

    The other side of the coin are people like me. I openly tell people I support Amir Khan ONLY because he, like me, is P*kistani. When the Olympics came around, I supported the guy just because he was a decent kid with great boxing skills for his age and it was nothing to do with race or religion. And because like in pretty much every other sport, I'll always support the Brit.

    Then when he started to get ahead of himself and talk about beating Mayweather etc, I stopped supporting him because I thought he needed to be brought down a peg or two and also because I generally like humble people (probably not the best sport to be a fan of then). Anyway, after Prescott his attitude seemed to change but I was also shocked with the amount of racist vitriol aimed towards him and I started supporting him again unconditionally because I realised for many racist non-p*kistanis he was representing my race/ethnicity and more importantly, him winning would lead to a lot of racist ****s punching walls in frustration.
     
  9. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    The political leaders in the West actually tend to be apologists for Islam and whitewash its sins. e.g. George W Bush described Islam as a "religion of peace". (Which is a million miles away from the truth.)

    If British political leaders are very critical of Islam then I must have missed that!

    And of course, there is nothing wrong with being "anti Islam". There is nothing "racist" about being "anti Islam" because Islam isn't a race it's an ideology. And as it happens, traditional Islam is a very twisted evil ideology.


    Sam Harris makes the obvious point:

    "Some critics of my work have claimed that my critique of Islam is “racist.” This charge is almost too silly to merit a response. But, as prominent writers can sometimes be this silly, here goes:

    My analysis of religion in general, and of Islam in particular, focuses on what I consider to be bad ideas, held for bad reasons, leading to bad behavior. My antipathy toward Islam—which is, in truth, difficult to exaggerate—applies to ideas, not to people, and certainly not to the color of a person’s skin. My criticism of the logical and behavioral consequences of certain ideas (e.g. martyrdom, jihad, honor, etc.) impugns white converts to Islam—like Adam Gadahn—every bit as much as Arabs like Ayman al-Zawahiri. I am also in the habit of making invidious comparisons between Islam and other religions, like Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. Must I point out that most Hindus, Buddhists, and Jains are not white like me? One would hope there would be no such need—but the work of writers like Chris Hedges suggests that the need is pressing.

    As I regularly emphasize when discussing Islam, no one is suffering under the doctrine of Islam more than Muslims are—particularly Muslim women. Those who object to any attack upon the religion of Islam as “racist” or as a symptom of “Islamophobia” display a nauseating insensitivity to the subjugation of women throughout the Muslim world. At this moment, millions of women and girls have been abandoned to illiteracy, forced marriage, and lives of slavery and abuse under the guise of “multiculturalism” and “religious sensitivity.” This is a crime to which every apologist for Islam is now an accomplice."

    http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/response-to-chris-hedges/
     
  10. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    before i carry on from page 3 i must respond to you ice.............................................................you hate barrera,come on admit it,you hate barerra,come on ice,cos he battered naz a fellow yorkshire ***:deal:happy:smooch

    oh and PK is a compete and utter ****,he is a breathing insult to the human race.
     
  11. bluenoseshf

    bluenoseshf Active Member Full Member

    1,084
    1
    Apr 1, 2009
    :good
     
  12. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    :patsch
     
  13. Boxalot

    Boxalot Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,094
    0
    Apr 8, 2010
    I don't think racism is the reason Khan is hated. Ok, yeah, a minority will dislike him because of that, but that minority will just be a small collection of idiots.

    I think the main reason he's disliked is because he is a complete and utter PR disaster. His team is unprofessional and he's surrounded by idiots which doesn't help either. It's a shame because in one interview he'll come across as a really nice, respectable young man, but then he'll literally walk around the corner to do an interview for another website and come across as a thick, arrogant little ****. I've never seen someone who can shift personality like that in a public domain, it really is shocking and - unfortunately for him - it's human nature to take the negatives rather than the positives, so he gets remembered for the poor interview.

    Also, he really is thick as ****.
     
  14. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    :lol: I don't hate Barrera because he slammed Nazs face into the turnbuckle and is an arrogant cockend, thats just my cover story. I hate him because he's a Mexican....I ****ing hate Mexicans me, they are all the same...short arsed, stinking, violent criminals, every single one of them, drug dealers too who cut their rivals in two with chainsaws and post the films up on youtube.....probably all bum rapists too. We should nuke the place.












































































    ** In reality you are right, he is a cheating **** and I hate him for what he did to Naz.....Given the opportunity I would say it to his face too....just before slamming his puffed up mush into something hard and available :D
     
  15. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008

    :lol::lol: brillient

    and i have no doubt you would my old :D yorkshire neighbour :thumbsup