Why do hayeters desperately discredit Chisora's 15-4 record instead of praising him

...for not padding his record against useless competition? Also, most hayeters, klittards and poletards conveniently ignore the fact that Chisora wiped the floor with prime Helenius (bububu his arm was injured, he suddenly turned to utter **** :|) in his own ****ing backyard. And last time I checked, Chisora gave Vitali his hardest fight since Lewis by winning two up to arguably four rounds against big Klit despite enraging him prior to the fight with his antics. Vitali was on his backfoot all night and didn't waste a second to punish Chisora for slapping him and spitting in his brother's face. Del Boy was too tough an opponent to pull that off.

Chisora then went on to challenge David "The Mayweather of Europe" Haye only to lose every second of every round and to get floored hard and ultimately stopped for the first time in his amateur and pro career.

Let's face it, Chisora is a good scalp on Haye's resume and not only did he defeat him but he absolutely annihilated him unlike anyone before.

 

What? Vitali did absolutely nothing to ruin him. Chisora ridiculed him outside the ring and fared reasonably well inside the ring without taking serious punishment. He was as good as ever when he stepped in the ring with the Hayemaker.

 

Top 5 H2H is probably a tad too enthusiastic but it does bug me when I see Helenius ahead of Chisora on fellow HW lists when Chisora ****ing killed him in his own backyard + went on to do well against Vitali. Again, Helenius is ranked higher than a boxer who schooled him silly. How does that make sense? Most boxers in the division would lose to Vitali and Haye, why would that cost him his top 10 spot when there's only trash to replace him? Helenius looked like dog**** against Sherman just recently and takes no hit in the rankings. Yeah, right.

 

He looks the real deal to me tbh. But then, Dimitrenko and Ustinov were probably **** all along.

Walker had Pulev hurt quite considerably.