Pacquiao is not only much greater than Marquez, but a much better fighter too.

Popkins and his 15 other usernames got banned, but I think his response would read "Something something, Pacquiao's declined, something something, Pac of the Cotto fight wins by KO1, something something, Marquez steroids, something something Floyd's a coward." I think those are all the talking points.

 

Lol

Popkins full of ****

 

He's not full of ****, he is ****.

The turd tried to come in here after fight 3 and lay it out as if he was some type of intelligent individual about to show us why Pacquiao deserved to win fight 3.

Right after fight 3 a bunch of *******s bailed out of this forum or registered under different user names. That should show everyone how dominant Marquez was in fight 3.
.....but this turd Popkins thought he was the smartest of them all trying to get across why Marquez lost again to Pacquiao.
Needless to say he got shot down cold by a bunch of us in the classic section no less!
Poor turd has'nt been the same since! :nut

 

Yeah, a fantasy point which has become reality in their last two outtings; resulting in JMM winning both fights. *****. :good

 

The smartest *******: Has a nice ring to it!
Being the smartest ******* is like being the smartest special kid with a helmet riding the short yellow bus, or having the biggest micro *****:yep

 

sounds like quite the event.

 

This content is protected

 

In my experience of this website, there's nothing quite like endless threads about "*******s" and "mayweather-tards" and, sometimes, 'Marquez-tards' and everyone getting all hysterical about their favourite super-hero. I suppose you are ultimately all 'tards' of one description or another, right? Ho ho.

Brilliant stuff. Keep it up.

 

Says the guy posting on said website.

Ho ho

**** off

 

Fragile Nancy Popkins had a mental break down the last time Marquez beat Pacquiao and I woudn't be surprised if he ended it all after he saw that KO

 

Well, I'm a "*******", and I'll tell you why.

The guy embodies everything an athlete/role model should possess. Grace. Class. Values and clean-living. Humility. Philanthropy. Hard work and dedication to his chosen profession. And lastly, dazzling skills in what he does.

Pacquiao embodies the spirit of achievement in a way that few have, the way Michael Jordan and Marvin Hagler did, and his looming presence, as much as you haters like to discount, is what has kept boxing in the public consciousness for the last decade, staving off it's inevitable mediocricy and declining relevence in the sports world.

You who hate Pacquiao will find youselves no longer having a (televised) sport to tune in to once Pacquiao exits.

For me, I'm a Pac-****, and proud of it.

 

JMM's resume and career is great because of one boxer - Pac.

In the end, history will be the judge on their "overall" accomplishments
and impact to the sport. I am confident that Pac > JMM.

 

I got no problem with pac. Its his fans. For instance, you actually believe boxing will no longer be televised after pac retires??

A: Boxing is one of the oldest organized sports in the world, it aint going anywhere

B: Pac isnt even the highest selling ppv fighter NOW.

You must be very new to the sport:verysad

 

ydksab