Pacquiao is not only much greater than Marquez, but a much better fighter too.

You must be brain dead. PAC just got laid out cold, plain detroyeyed by marquez.

 

against each other, Marquez may very well be a stylistic nightmare for Pac, yes.

But Manny Pacquiao throughout his career has been much more effective against higher level of competition.

 

Interesting...well the award for what matters-who knocked the **** out the other-goes to JMM by very clear margin, which is my point. The results of their latest respective fight prove this.

One had his hand raised in victory, the other was damn near killed in the ring and taken to the hospital...end thread.

 

PERFECT example:good:deal

 

Popkins has got to be the most "owned" poster to ever post here. I've never seen such dumb****ery...repeated over and over and over.

 

Poor Popkins.

 

LOL...

 

bumping this thread is stupid. Just cause Tarver knocked out Roy Jones does not make him the greater or better fighter.


Same thing with Pac & Marquez.

Pac > JMM regardless of what happened a couple weeks ago.

 

Pacquiao is greater due to his accomplishments, but as far as the better fighter?

Come back at me when Pacquiao manages to KTFO a fighter whos much faster, durable, younger and much more atlhletically superior than him by using his technique and ring iq.


Ill wait.

 

Pacquiao has managed to KTFO a fighter who's ring technique is superior to his using his physical assets, which is just as valid as doing the contrary.

Being a better fighter is a global package. Technique and ring IQ are not the only criteria that matter in the ring.

 

I guess Jmm can be as "GREAT" as Manny if he beats over the hill fighters like Cotto, Mosley, and Hatton. He should fight them now. THEN *******s can stfu. :rofl

 

He sure as **** couldn't KTFO a technician with far superior ring iq and inferior physical assets last weekend, now did he?

 

No way. PAC is/was no Roy Jones. A million lite years away.

 

end thread

 

naaaaaa