Burns decides not to have broner fight for next according to his own manager

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by lirva, Dec 17, 2012.


  1. lirva

    lirva Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    97
    Jul 7, 2010
    Burns has decided not to have the broner fight for the time being and wants another fight in Glasgow next rather than broner according to this article

    http://www1.skysports.com/boxing/ne...drien-Broner-in-unification-fight-next-Spring

    His manager said he doesn't want to fight broner next

    For the idiots who can't read between the lines, *HIS MANAGER DIDN'T SAY HE BOTTLED IT*. According to the article he says "Ricky didn't want to jump from a non-event to the biggest fight of his life in a matter of weeks."

    So it's Burns who doesn't want Broner next according to the article.

    It will probably be journeyman Jose Ocampo

    is that bottling the Broner fight for next? You decide!
     
  2. Peter__1987

    Peter__1987 Guest

    He doesn't strike me as the type to bottle a fight.
     
  3. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    How is saying you are happy to fight somebody next Spring bottling it?
     
  4. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    Talk about paraphrasing?
     
  5. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    Yeah, he sure as hell bottled it when the much vaunted puncher Roman Martinez came over and knocked him down in the first round. Or when he fought Katsidis. Or when he fought Mitchell.
     
  6. lirva

    lirva Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    97
    Jul 7, 2010
    His manager didn't say he bottled it obviously but said he didn't want it next which is saying he doesn't want the fight next when broner clearly does
     
  7. Peter__1987

    Peter__1987 Guest

    He's not a bottlejob, that's clear to see.

    Your clutching at straws.
     
  8. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    The biggest concern for this fight is Frank. If he thinks Burns will lose, the fight won't happen. It's got very little to do with what Burns wants.
     
  9. craney91

    craney91 Boxing Addict banned

    4,934
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    Wont say anything until it is 100% definite and the fight has been announced :hey...so we will wait until the spring. Things change :lol:

    I have a hunch the fight aint gonna happen anytime next year.

    Broner is on another level. Why would you stick your car in reverse when you are doing 200mph? Backwards move for Broner, because once he smashes Abril all over the place, the money team gonna look to push Adrien into elite level fights. They wont be looking twice at the likes of Vazquez and ya boy.
     
  10. Jonny5-9

    Jonny5-9 Active Member Full Member

    734
    0
    Oct 25, 2012
    I dont have a problem with this, **** Broner, **** unification, **** genuinely proving yourself on the world stage, hopefully this could be the one we have all been waiting for . . . .

    Burns v Cook 2 - The Redemption!
     
  11. craney91

    craney91 Boxing Addict banned

    4,934
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    Nee nor, nee nor, nee nor.

    Here comes Billy! Close your legs pal he's on the way! :hey Quick get a Mars bar and a cuppa! You might be able to distract him! Dont let him get started, because when you do, he doesnt stop, the blokes got more go than anything else I've come across on this forum. :hey
     
  12. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    Then with all due respect,don't you think your thread title is bang out of order?
     
  13. lirva

    lirva Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    97
    Jul 7, 2010
    Mate, it's obvious that im saying I think he bottled the fight

    Jesus christ

    His manager would never say his own fighter bottled the fight obviously.

    His manager said Burns himself said he didn't want the fight. This is according to that article.

    We are all entitled to our opinions
     
  14. craney91

    craney91 Boxing Addict banned

    4,934
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    It could be correct though, who knows what the man in question said to the man in question? For all we know, the man in question may well and f*cking truly bottled it, quack f*cking quack and all of that. At the end of the day, none of us know, because none of us are there or know the men in question, therefore you cant rule out any possibility behind closed doors.

    IMO they know exactly whats up with Broner, the fighter in question may well want some, but FWP will delay and delay while trying to keep the fighter in question relevant in domestic fights. We all know FW loves those domestic scraps, he is very reluctant to throw fighters in with elite fighters until there is literally nobody left to fight.

    For a champion like the fighter in question, who holds the WBO, being matched up against fighters not even in the top 20. Is just embarrassing for the fighter in F*CKING question. :rofl
     
  15. craney91

    craney91 Boxing Addict banned

    4,934
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    Fanboys dont understand that and how that works though. :lol: They just think anything that comes out of their mans teams mouth, is just 100% legit and real. THE TRUTH. :lol:

    Promoters and trainers will never expose their own fighter. They will always sell them as the dogs, stand by your man and all that.

    But deep down, when they are alone, sat around the table, sweating and shitting themselves, they know whats really up. They've got this far, the real champ Broner has called their man out and they dont know what to do and neither does F-rank.