Povetkin-Klitschko to be announced next week

Agreed. :good

Hopefully he doesn't "Boytsov" out.

 

wlads what 37 now??

and the concesus is the next 3 years will make him or break him??

i find that very very unfair.considering the run hes been on and now he has to go through another crop to gain aproval??

if wlad goes through 2013 with
pov
pulev
fury/areolla/stiverne

ill be very ****ing impressed

 

:huh

The post you quoted was about Pulev, not Klitschko....

 

Only thing he see is Wlad's sacks swinging in his eyes.

 

Maybe, but he's 36 with about 6.5 years in and Joe Louis had nearly twelve. Big ask.

I can understand this as far as interest. I feel a little bit of it too. It just rubs me the wrong way that many are seemingly placing more validity on Pulev as a challenger without what I would call any legitimate cause.

:rofl The illiterate ones, I guess.

Schulz was really not a young up-and-comer/upstart at that stage, despite technically being young. He was a very seasoned vet, who was even a bit worn out, physically, who had retired right afterward. Granted, Dino is a troll and is owed no intellectual honesty of any kind. So, carry on.

 

I wouldn't say Pulev does not have any legitimate cause, nor can you say that Povetkin hasn't lost some of his legitimate standing. But we can agree to disagree. If Wlad fights either, I will be satisfied with the matchup.

 

No ****, I have never seen her in a thread unrelated to K2. Ever.

 

You should better close your mouth instead of insulting people who you never met and never attack you.

I can tell you, I do not care about your post.

Nobody have to be a boxing professor to know that Povetkin´s chance of winning is very low. He has no defence, no headmovement, no good footwork, no punching power....

Wlad will knock Povetkin out and his team knows this too.

 

sounds good. I'll be looking forward to this one.

 

I don't know if Povetkn is aware of the fact that he's full of **** ("I don't know why we haven't fought yet") or if the poor "kid" is that ****ing stupid.

 

I bet she's a huge Broner fan.

 

This content is protected

 

Just so I know you're reading me right, I didn't mean doesn't have a legitimate cause as a challenger. His cause is very, very legitimate, in my book. But I don't see there's a legitimate cause to place more importance on him as a contender than Povetkin, if they both are willing, right now (remains to be seen, I guess), Povetkin having done more and beaten better, regardless of leaving a bad impression against Huck. And I say that by way of the same logic as your statement that you can't say that Povetkin has lost his standing.

 

By that math Vitali has nearly nine years.

 

You should heed your own advice first, conspiracy theorist.

You don't care, yet you responded didn't you? :rofl:rofl

We already know you are no boxing professor, hell you aren't even a real boxing fan. You know nothing of boxing apart from K2, and when the rumor came out that Fritz was going to train Wlad again you were renouncing your support for Wlad. What a flake you are. You're a fan of an image, an ideal made up in your mind.....not of a boxer or a sport. As a poster, you're nothing more than a parrot, repeating the same generic lines over and over and offering no useful insight or comments.