Adamek - Cunningham II Weight-In Results [VIDEO]

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Outlaw, Dec 21, 2012.


  1. Outlaw

    Outlaw Member Full Member

    288
    0
    Sep 17, 2012
    Adamek - 223 lbs (101.2 kg)

    Cunningham - 203 lbs (92.1 kg)

    [ame]http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/27914092[/ame]
     
  2. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,446
    29,317
    Jan 18, 2010
    Expected as much... Cunningham comes in the same weight he would have as a CW.
    Won't be surprised if Adamska stops him this time.
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    i believe that will be the case
     
  4. Ianian58

    Ianian58 Active Member Full Member

    680
    2
    Oct 16, 2012
    Should be a great fight. Adamek by decision.
     
  5. turbina

    turbina Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    7
    Apr 17, 2008
    This will be a good fight.

    Adamek getting heavier from fight to fight.

    Can't believe he fought at LHW only 5 years ago..
     
  6. Outlaw

    Outlaw Member Full Member

    288
    0
    Sep 17, 2012
    I just added a vid, enjoy.

    My predictions - Adamek win by TKO
     
  7. ludwig

    ludwig Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,049
    59
    Apr 29, 2010
    Interesting. Cunningham will attempt to avoid Adamek's power shots and win a decision. With this being an eliminator on national tv an outright robbery is unlikely.

    We'll see whether Adamek can land and whether Cunningham can take his shots.

    The 203 lbs underlines that Cunningham is a natural cruiser and never had to drain to make 200.
     
  8. Danebrogen

    Danebrogen Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,511
    6
    May 20, 2012
    Cunningham looks ripped, but he also looks very weak. Kind of like a kingsize Timothy Bradley. Adamek by KO.
     
  9. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    Adamek is making a mistake with that weight, he weighed around the same against Chambers and looked old and slow

    USS is not and never will be a natural HW
     
  10. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Need to put more money on Adamek
     
  11. Espin88

    Espin88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    9
    Sep 28, 2012
    Hamer: 221lbs
    Glazkov: 221lbs
     
  12. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    this amount of weight makes little difference at almost 100kg

    Steve looks the bigger and better, great genetics
     
  13. mclovellin87

    mclovellin87 el Terrible Full Member

    1,140
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    Agree with you. I don't get why Adamek comes in bigger and bigger when his style at HW is about movement and volume, seems counter-productive. This might be one of the few fights at HW when he's the aggressor but I don't see the weight helping him much.
     
  14. PowerBack

    PowerBack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,921
    2
    Nov 17, 2012
    Why is Adamek putting on so much weight? He should probably be about 205-215?
     
  15. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    ****ing Bloodworth who has a napoleonic complex thinks bigger is inherently better contrary to the evidence which is that Adamek always looks slower and sluggish above 220lbs. Adamek's best weight would be 212-216.