I don't think so. He needs more victories against valuable opponents. Only Kevin Johnson is good in his record, but it was on Prizefighter. I would like to see them in 12 rounds fight. Nowadays I higher rating Chris Arreola, Tony Thompson, Johnathon Banks and Deontay Wilder (ok, he also fight with bums, but 26 win and all by KO awe-inspiring..)
Has Chris Arreola retired or something? He's no world beater but having a " 2nd best US heavyweight" debate without mentioning his name is a bit odd. In my opinion, Chambers and Chris are still 1 and 2 even if Eddie moved down.
If Hammer beats Glazkov LEGITIMATELY he is #1 with a bullet. Mitchell has been knocked pretty far down, and... Banks is not an exciting contender since due to his small size, he could not possibly beat a Klit. Chambers has gone to crusier Wilder with his last shitty performance in which the crowd was booing has proved very little even after almost 30 fights Arreola, contrary to all hype, still does not have a signature win and due to his lack of conditioning and talent probably never will. Thompson is a has been that never was Franklin Lawrence is, at 37 years old...well, he ain't going to beat anyone. Jennings, despite the hype, does not have a legit signature win since Byarm was much more easily beaten by Mago and Lyachovich was totally shot. Its Hammer or nothing, and lets be honest that its nothing, since Hammer is not in Glazkov's league.
I'd rate Arreola and Banks higher but if we are talking US prospects yes its between these two, it should be a close one tonight but i see Glazkov taking it. Jennings is the best US prospect IMO.
Not two. But he will hop over the guys in the 5-10 for me including Mitchell, Lawerence, Grano, Thompson ect. I rank Arreola, Jennings, Wilder and maybe Banks above him with this.
If Tor beats Glazkov PROSPECTS: 1. Jennings 2. Wilder 3. Tor 4. Ortiz 5. Hanks 6. Kauffmann 7. Barnwell 8. Dawejko 9. Foreman III 10. Shimmell