It was a close fight, I had cunningham winning but he didn't look that much more impressive than adamek. Especially being on your back foot for the last 4 rounds covering up and not throwing anything but a jab back. Don't make it sound like there was multiple knock downs and huge punches being landed by either fighter, nobody got "schooled". Adamek was the aggressor and landed some nice punches, cunningham boxed more and picked his shots.
People just always got excuses when the white guy wins. Btw adamek is American he has lived in New Jersey for like 25 years.
You can make a case for a draw if you give Adamek some rounds he probably lost depending on your outlook. But it was a cunningham decision.
Pac-Bradley and Rios-Abril were far worse which doesn't mean this wasn't a bad decision, I had Adamek losing, even though I'm a big fan of his
Final CompuBox stats: Jabs Adamek 49 of 246, 19% Cunningham 129 of 348, 37% Power Adamek 120 of 267, 45% Cunningham 80 of 167, 48% Total Adamek 169 of 513, 33% Cunningham 209 of 515, 41%
Oh look, it's our favourite boxrec- and compubox warrior bremen proving everyone wrong once again. :good
Sorry, but keyboard warrior's outrage over the fight they scored over shitty internet stream does not register with me. You don't know **** about boxing my friend, especially when it comes to what happens outside the ring.
You don't get points for simply being the aggressor though, you get points for effective agression, also Adamek in a lot of the rounds would only work for the last 20 - 30 seconds but the rest of the round he would be getting caught with a good jab and straight right.