Tomasz Adamek vs. Steve Cunningham II RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Dec 22, 2012.

Page 53 of 59
  1. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    11,524
    Likes Received:
    34
    And you are the supposed "expert"? Tell us more about these qualifications. the only thing you are expert at is keyboard thumping.
     
    lzolnier, Dec 22, 2012
    #781
  2. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    5,623
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wrong. One had it 115-112, which is still bull****.
     
    gobblock, Dec 22, 2012
    #782
  3. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    5,611
    Likes Received:
    1
    I had Cunningham winning 8 - 4

    119-109 ? :blood That is just ****ing stupid
     
    VanillaKilla, Dec 22, 2012
    #783
  4. carras

    carras Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,596
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes you did....
    Good call:good
     
    carras, Dec 22, 2012
    #784
  5. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    26,793
    Likes Received:
    7
    What a disgraceful post. Makes all boxing fans look bad.
     
    MichiganWarrior, Dec 22, 2012
    #785
  6. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    5,623
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's the reason Freddie no longer has answers in the corner, and the reason he sucks as a commentator. All there is to it. He should take on less work so he's at least there for his ailing fighters in training camp. Interesting about Roach admitting insincere scoring just to build up enthusiasm...
     
    gobblock, Dec 22, 2012
    #786
  7. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    5,611
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wow, it flew right over your head....

    Adamek winning = More ticket sales, more people tuning in on TV = More money for promoters

    Cunningham/Chambers winning = How many fans do these guys have? Does anyone know who these guys are in PA?

    Polish fans = Support/Money

    American fans = Nothing.... When is the last time Cunningham or Chambers fought in a packed house vs a nobody? :think

    It has nothing to do with cheering... It is all about $$
     
    VanillaKilla, Dec 22, 2012
    #787
  8. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    13,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    You gave Adamek eight rounds? EIGHT?

    Please specify on how you scored and which category Adamek bested Cunningham at: (in order of relevance)

    1. Clean punching
    2. Effective aggressiveness
    3. Ring generalship
    4. Defense

    Now tell me, on what account could you have possibly Adamek that wide ahead? And bear in mind, ineffective aggresion merits no points.
     
    Faerun, Dec 22, 2012
    #788
  9. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    29,744
    Likes Received:
    8,260
    Not really. Cunnigham had moments in just about every round, and won his rounds more clearly than Ademeck won his, with the exception of one...maybe two rounds at most. 119-109 isn't egregious, in this case. You could make a better case for Cunningham whitewashing Ademek than you could for an Ademek victory.

    I had the same score as you, btw.
     
    Drew101, Dec 22, 2012
    #789
  10. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    6,830
    Likes Received:
    188
    That should tell you something:

     
    bremen, Dec 22, 2012
    #790
  11. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    11,524
    Likes Received:
    34
    folks this is what happens when you spend 80% of the fight on your bicycle. Neither the fans nor the judges like this and gave the fight to the aggressor.
     
    lzolnier, Dec 22, 2012
    #791
  12. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    13,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Your ignorance is that grave, it boggles my mind. What "bicycle"? Cunningham didn't run, he fought on the ****ing outside because he realized Adamek is too slow on foot to follow him. Some call it having a perfect gameplan.
     
    Faerun, Dec 22, 2012
    #792
  13. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    18,614
    Likes Received:
    8
    He's Polish. The moron can't screw in a light bulb by himself.
     
    CASH_718, Dec 22, 2012
    #793
  14. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,903
    Likes Received:
    126
    This.

    I had it 117-111 btw.

    I can't see anything less than 115-113 Cunningham.
     
    des3995, Dec 22, 2012
    #794
  15. Norbix

    Norbix Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even though it's wrong, it's what's happening with judges nowadays. If you fight mostly on the backfoot that's automatically giving points to the other guy. That and the fact that Adamek landed more power punches probably gave him more rounds than he should've gotten. I say Cunningham edged it, and a draw would've been fine for a third and neutral fight.
     
    Norbix, Dec 22, 2012
    #795
Page 53 of 59