Pulev is better than Glazkov... But me personally, I think Amir Mansour and David price is better than Pulev and has a better chance to take down the Klits... And people may think this is funny but ive been seeing Tyson Fury elevating his game after each fight.. He's really starting to understand the sweet science and i think he's a very serious contender..
Being 40 doesn't mean anything cuz after all, it's about the mileage on the odometer and not the age.. Amir Mansour is a young 40 as he preserved himself well in prison.. The current HW division is so shitty that he can definitely make noise if he stays out of prison.. he's 40... and ????? Those of you who boxed before would have a better understanding of what im talking about...
The jury's still out on Pulev. Like most of the other prime prospects, he still isn't proven, though he sure looks good. I used to like Glazkov a lot, but he didn't really look good against Hamer. The skill is still there, but he seems to have slowed down. Even against the gatekeeper Airich, he didn't look like his old, dominating self. He's only 28, but I honestly think he's already on the downslide.
12-0 and he has a much better resume than Wilder At least he's willing to step in with other highly regarded prospects, and decent Journeymen unlike Wilder...
Yes, but I think Glazkov has the better chin, and is more likely to adapt in a fight. I think Glazkov is a little better. We shall see.
I still want to see Khan Kubrat against a top American heavyweight before I make a legitimate conclusion. He is proven against Euro level/type/style fighters like Dimitrenko and Ustinov. Yet, he had some problems with Travis Walker. I was hoping that Cunningham would win against Adamek so that Khan Kubrat would get a chance to school him. Khan Kubrat needs more exposure in America so fights with Jennings or Wilder would do nicely. Unfortunately, Khan Kubrat has to fight Adamek next. Pity.