Rewarding ineffective aggression over clean punching, ring generalship and defense?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Faerun, Dec 26, 2012.


  1. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    :good
     
  2. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    when you start looking and giving credit for minor things, then you maybe looking for an excuse to give the round to the fighter you like.
     
  3. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005

    Trust me when i tell you IB is terrible and very biased when scoring rounds.

    It has been proven time and time again.
     
  4. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Im not asking what your scorecards are. Im asking why with the countless BS robberies that take place in Germany you dont create these same kind of threads as they happen?
     
  5. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Let it all out, mate. I'm all ears.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,534
    81,594
    Nov 30, 2006
    There's a reason pro judges require training, you know.

    It isn't supposed to be easy enough that any idiot can slide off their bar stool, squint at the TV screen, and belch out "DERP, da guy coming forward throwing da bombs, I think he won da round!"

    Again, nuances = beyond your capacity.
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,534
    81,594
    Nov 30, 2006
    Your ***** ass only thinks so because I've scored against someone whose nuts you hug. :yep

    I like how you sometimes try and feign interest in the sport in general, and not just in a few select fighters with a certain "something" in common. ;) Very cute.
     
  8. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    I actually might have. :huh My thread history is pretty long, you're welcome to browse. Also, this thread is not directed at a certain country. I don't give a **** where Adamek is from. The point is that judges increasingly favour the fighter who's coming forward even though there's no basis for it. And Adamek has been the worst offender this year with two dodgy decisions going his way purely because he was on his frontfoot and his opponents on their backfoots. Despite blocking a huge portion of their punches with his face while not hitting **** he got awarded a win.

    So yeah, this thread is not about disproportionately high robberies in the US or in favour of Poles. Like, not at all.
     
  9. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    I was 100% nuetral for Vic's last fight.....you were not:deal

    We both know im not the only who has called you out for your shitty biased scoring nights.
     
  10. gregy741

    gregy741 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    1
    May 11, 2010
    get some medication or some life....your obsession with adamek is not healthy
    you are not boxing fan thats for sure...
    adamek is not great heavyweight so there are lots of mediocre good or plain fighters but i dont see you shiting 24/7 on anyone else....
    go to tko6 thread..you can shine there
     
  11. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    Enough already FFS! The challenger should have to take the belt, not run all fight. That's not a champion. Adamek won the fight, SD. GTFO it!
     
  12. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    IB gives credit to fighters who make stupid faces after getting tagged.

    Trust me this guy SUCKS at scoring fights.
     
  13. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    :lol:

    Selective perception, gregy, look it up. It's not me who's bitching about Adamek 24/7, it's you who's overly sensitive for any criticizm towards Polish boxers. You're a paranoid **** but guess what, I've got some not so selective perceptive stuff for ya:


     
  14. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Another rule made up by Adamek apologists to make themselves feel better. :lol:
     
  15. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    I find IB's RBR's awesome, and 99% spot on. Do I agree with the Adamek scoring? No. Remember though, judging is ALWAYS going to be subjective. ALWAYS. Hockey scores are ALWAYS objective. Like the difference between quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis.

    I was actually happy with all the attention the fight got. I bet there has been quite a few people that have Youtubed the fight that don't normally watch boxing. You know what's on the right side of those clips people watch on Youtube? Other related clips. Of boxing matches. More fans the better imo.

    But my opinion of IB and the RBR's? I've gone back on the dedicated thread and 'rewatched' many fights. This fight just seems to have a differing of opinion. But what does bug me, and has happened a lot after this fight, is the personal insults. If people could argue about the fight itself, the discussion would be so much better. But too often, instead of actually talking about the fight, posters just say "you're an idiot", 'dumbass', or put up silly pictures. Kind of trivializes our sport.