Rewarding ineffective aggression over clean punching, ring generalship and defense?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Faerun, Dec 26, 2012.


  1. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    Seriously? LOL. And why the **** not? Did you not bother to read my whole post? LOL, I said I had to watch it a few times, NOT just once. WOW, dont get into arguments about a poster's comments without first understanding the comment.
    I read all your comments IB, or anyone elses I'm going to comment on. I gave you huge props and complimented your RBR's. You couldnt even bother to read my whole post and try and understand what I posted. Can you say arrogance maybe?
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,654
    83,494
    Nov 30, 2006
    It's no more difficult to score live than watching a replay.

    ...assuming you know the ins and outs of scoring and aren't adhering to silly tropes like "AGGRESSOR WINS ALWAYS!" and "CHALLENGER MUST TAKE THE BELT!" :yep
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,654
    83,494
    Nov 30, 2006
  4. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    Sorry, but I like to watch fighter's, well, fight. Not run around in a circle. If I liked that, I'd watch track. Especially heavyweights. If they are too afraid to engage, they should find a new sport. Since talking about Adamek, I think as a fighter, he did a better job against Vitali than USS did against him. But Vitali won a shutout, no debate. Aggression doesnt always win fights.
     
  5. macp1

    macp1 Guest

  6. artful

    artful *practice makes perfect* Full Member

    4,163
    0
    May 8, 2010
    Go watch mma.
     
  7. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Now you're just pulling stuff out of your ass.

    This content is protected


    Er...pretty sure I can?! In fact, I don't recall Cunningham being staggered once whereas Adamek was legitimately hurt in round 7 almost to the point where he went down and only held up by the ropes. Adamek also got stopped regularly and very abruptly by Cunninghams jab's when lunging forward. This is where I can't say the reciprocal is true.
     
  8. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    Another one with trouble reading a whole post beyond the first few words lol
     
  9. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    This is getting redundant. Been 5 days and the same **** over and over again. Tomasz Adamek SD Steve Cunningham. Now stop whining and move on. The better fighter won.
     
  10. artful

    artful *practice makes perfect* Full Member

    4,163
    0
    May 8, 2010
    USS landed an uppercut in one of the later rounds, that seemed to stagger Adamek too.
     
  11. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    No, you should. You just admitted that you don't stick to the scoring criteria at hand when scoring a fight. Instead you revert to your fantasy criteria. :lol:
     
  12. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    No. Try learning the English language. I said I dont score a fight the first time I watch it. I enjoy it first. Then I score it, and usually with the sound off.
     
  13. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    I have no idea what you are talking about. This is what I was responded to:

    You state that you prefer a certain style (offensive) over another and that makes you biased. Having a style bias makes your scorecards useless because aggression without effectiveness is no scoring criteria as you've just learned in my OP.

    Also, you keep whining about people not responding to your posts. How about you go into detail how USS didn't hurt Adamek, when I proved you wrong with a gif? Can you admit that you were wrong for once?
     
  14. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    Not really fantasy criteria. I watch boxing to watch two guys box. I watch hockey to watch two teams play hockey. I watch The Olympics to watch people running around.
     
  15. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    How am I whining about people not responding to my posts. Im taking issue with people commenting on my posts without actually reading the whole post. And to me, it seemed the most USS did was frustrate TA with his pitter patter jab throughout the fight. He stung like a mosquito. Adamek actually hit him. That's what I saw. You obviously saw sometyhing different, which is fine, and what should be debated. But how can you retort to comments without actually reading the comment? And not even saying you individually. It happens a lot on here, and has many times already in this thread.